Monday, March 30, 2015

Hillary Is Ineligible to Run for President!

Hillary Is Ineligible to Run for President!
Al Ritter 

I always thought that international donations to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Secretary of State would be the biggest thing that would sink her. Of course there is a huge difference in Hillary Clinton going to jail, and Hillary being denied the office of President. I can already see the cynical, disbelieving look in your face, but humor me for a little bit and I’ll tell you how America can deny her that highest office in the nation! 

Hillary’s obvious arrogance over her emailgate has led her to a false sense of security. Her secure feeling of arrogance is based around the idea that Eric Holder, or Loretta Lynch would never try her for her crime of destroying her all her email records. She is probably correct in that assumption, but there are other ways to skin this cat!

Hillary has violated U.S. Federal code: 18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally. This is the exact wording of this law:  

  (a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.” 

Pay close attention to the wording underlined especially “and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.” 

You ask…..”What good is this if she won’t be prosecuted by the DOJ?”

This is where state’s rights come into play.  Each State has to certify and approve a candidate to run in their state and be placed on the ballot. Are you following me so far? If just two or three Republican Governors pushed their attorney generals to deny the certification based on the violation of this federal law, then Hillary would be forced into defensive mode rather than thumbing her nose at the entire country for her obvious arrogance. The states could enforce federal law without even involving the DOJ. The courts could be forced into constant appeal processes until the time constraints could make her run irrelevant. Only two or three states denying her certification would sink ANY chances of her winning.

Jail time could wait until the new Administration takes charge and pushes their own Attorney General to prosecute her.  

The law is irrefutable in its meaning and very explicit in its punishment, so I don’t think she could battle this very successfully. 

I LOVE it when a plan comes together!..........Mail this to your Republican Governor!

Monday, March 23, 2015

Yes Doubters, Ted Cruz Is Eligible!

Yes Doubters, Ted Cruz Is Eligible!
Al Ritter 

I was astounded this week by how many supposed “conservatives” saw fit to attack Sen. Ted Cruz the FIRST declared Republican candidate from the great state of Texas. It seems that questions about his eligibility have surfaced. Although I would have expected these questions to come from the left first, it seems that the less than true conservatives have served him up for a meal for the moderates first. 

You would think that the liberal “Y” generation had seen what was available and declared Che Guevara the preferred winner rather than Ted Cruz, one of the possible contenders for the Presidency of the United States of America. 

The more rabid and less informed Republicans site the Constitution alone to declare his ineligible status. That is ONE basis but later laws and immigration ruling have stated differently.  

Under Title 8 of the U.S. Code, Section 1401 defines the following as citizens of the United States upon birth… or natural-born citizens:
Anyone born inside the United States. The person must be “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States. (This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.)
  • Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe
  • Anyone born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
  • Anyone born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
  • Anyone born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
  • Anyone found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
  • Anyone born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
If this isn’t enough to convince you, more is available: 

“a person born before May 24, 1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.” is a citizen. 

Added to:  

This relates to the law as it relates to the time Ted Cruz was born……Section 1401 of Title 8 of the US Code, Currently, citizenship in the U.S. is governed by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952.  December 24, 1952 – November 14, 1986. A person born abroad between those dates is a U.S. citizen upon birth if all of the following are true:
  1. The person’s parents were married at the time of birth;
  2. One of the person’s parents was a U.S. citizen when the person was born;
  3. The citizen parent lived at least ten years in the United States before the child’s birth; and
  4. A minimum of 5 of these 10 years in the United States were after the citizen parent’s 14th birthday.
According to these definitions Ted Cruz falls under the definition (at least according to present law) is a “natural citizen.”
Because the Supreme Court has never actually debated on what a “natural citizen” is, nor does it seem to be accepted for future debate, the result WILL be that Ted Cruz is eligible to run for President of the United States of America.
If Moderate Republicans and Democrats are smart, they wouldn’t touch this subject with a 20 foot pole, but then again I regress.


Friday, March 20, 2015

A Sad Reality

A Sad Reality
Kevin Bryant
St. Augustine of Hippo (354-430 AD): "Though defensive violence will always be 'a sad necessity' in the eyes of men of principle, it would be still more unfortunate if wrongdoers should dominate just men."
Every President in U.S. History has had to face the sad reality of choosing whether to send men and now women into combat for what we perceive as a “Just Cause”, whether to ensure our safety or those who are innocent and caught up in the struggles of opposing forces. Countless has died in the service of this country. Many honor their service and sacrifice for they did their job without hesitation.
The sad reality now is “We The People” are being attacked by the very government that is supposed to be working for us, not against us. The founders made it quite clear that America was to have a government “of the people, by the people and for the people”. No longer does such a government exist, at least not in this country. Sure, we have elected officials that work on our behalf but they are few and far between. Of the 100 U.S. Senators and 435 Representatives that make up the United States Congress, at least 400+ of them believe in their hearts that it is their job and their duty is not to do their work for the people but to rule over them as they think best.
The Civil War was not a war over slavery. It was a battle between what congress deemed as “the collective good” verses “state’s rights”. Had the south won the war, those 13 states would be free of the intrusion of federalism into our daily lives.
Imagine a country where there is no federal debt? Imagine a country where people get to decide via the ballot box how much they should be taxed. Image a country where the wage earners decide who deserves assistance from the government and what is required of the recipient to receive it. Makes you wish the people in America really had a voice in how and what the federal government does. If you think for a single moment in time you have a voice, well that was just time wasted.
There are countless thousands who would give all to see an America that is once again that One True Great Nation. The sad reality is they can’t do it alone. It’s not the military or the police that is standing in their way, it is the federal government and those 400+ in congress that keep us from changing what is eroding this country. It is a Commander – in – Chief that lies, steals and cheats the American people out of their money and their liberties through executive order when on those few occasions the 400+ self-proclaiming masters of the masses aren’t giving in to his every whim.
In the world of politics, change rarely comes from the top unless it is change that is not good for the common man. Things can only be changed if the common man speaks out not against perceived injustices about race or religion or reparations for evil practices long since passed. The change must come from the bottom up.
America needs a Constitutional Convention of States. Our founders wrote into the constitution a way to peacefully change things should a government grow so out of control it no longer works for the people it governs for. We need serious changes soon or America will just become another democracy that collapsed under its own weight.
We need Judges who follow the law, not ideology and a way to have them removed if they do.
We need recall procedures for everyone from the Town Council to the President of the United States.
We need strict limits to what executive actions can be taken.
We need a constitutional amendment for a balanced budget and mandatory payments to lower the national debt each year.
We need to abolish both the Federal Reserve and the 17th Amendment.
We need to severely cut the powers of the EPA, IRS and many other agencies.
We need so much more as well.
There is no one size fits all solutions yet our politicians continue to create them and all they end up accomplishing is just creating more chaos and complications.
We have one federal government and 50 state governments. Each share similar problems but instead of the states experimenting with what will work and what will not, half the country looks to the federal government to find and implement every solution to every problem. Most of those problems caused by the very same people who are being asked to provide a solution.
America needs an uprising against the ever increasing power and reach of the Federal Government. The sad reality is, this will never happen. America has plenty of men of principle that are more than willing to fight for returning power back to the people but lack men of wealth to back such a noble and just cause.

Friday, March 6, 2015

“The Problem with History”

“The Problem with History”
By Ron Boat

When you look at the words and actions of B Hussein Obama, you need to realize that he is living out the words and actions of past - dictators, tyrants and murderers.

He didn’t invent the idea of total government control, he didn’t dream up “wealth redistribution”, he didn’t create the concept of overwhelming the system in order to bring it down and allowing the government bureaucrats to rebuild it in their own likeness. He’s following the dictates and dictators of the past.

Yes, dictators. If you look that word up in an English dictionary it says, “a person exercising absolute power, especially a ruler who has absolute, unrestricted control in a government without hereditary succession.”

If you look it up in a British dictionary it is quoted as saying,

1.     “A ruler who is not effectively restricted by a constitution, laws, recognized opposition, etc.”
2.     an absolute, esp. tyrannical, ruler
3.     A person who makes pronouncements, as on conduct, fashion, etc., which are regarded as authoritative
4.     A person who behaves in an authoritarian or tyrannical manner

(more later on this point)

In looking back over the last 6 years of this democratic, progressive, reformist, liberal and dare I say radical group, who follows an agenda of social and economic destruction, we see that the paths of the past are being laid out and even well-trodden again in America. The lessons of politics and morality Obama learned as a youth from his Marxist leaning father, his promiscuous, immoral mother, his mentors such as the card carrying communist Frank Marshal Davis, the Black Liberation, separatist teaching of Jeremiah Wright and hate filled mindset and rants of Rev. Michael Pfleger are ever present in the actions and words of this president.

You have only to read Obama’s own words to reveal the inner hatred and distaste for America, for the white race, for capitalism and the American way of free life. On pages 99-101 “of Dreams from My Father”  Barry is quoted as saying “To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets.”

Obama's father said, "[T]heoretically there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100 percent of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed." Obama wrote, "It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa, that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself."

His own grandmother laments, "I look at him and I see all the same things—he has taken everything from his father. The son is realizing everything the father wanted. The dreams of the father are still alive in the son."

Obama went on to say “But this strategy alone couldn't provide the distance I wanted… No, it remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.” If today we as a people were to “seek out” and “only associate ourselves with white people” would we not be labeled as the racists of the past when “coloreds and whites” didn’t share the same drinking fountains or schools? Was that lesson from the past not done away with and learned as a basis for today? Are we not known by the friends we choose, the associates of our lives, the life we’ve led?

Barry was so aware of race and his desire for separatism at a young age that he “ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of twelve or thirteen, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.” And when you see the past and continuing associations with the Louis Faraakhans, Al Sharptons and Jesse Jacksons of his black world and realize the vast numbers of associations and appointments of “people from his past” such as Holder, Jarrett, Emanuel, Axelrod, Jones and others with socialistic, yea Communistic and racist leanings, you can see the direction the country is headed under this rule of social liberalism and non-exceptional Americanism.

To digress back to my thoughts earlier about this “dictatorish” style combined with racism, as you look at the definitions above, can you not see what power has been grabbed, a ruler who feels unrestrained by constitutional law or opposition, a person who makes pronouncements, as on conduct, fashion, etc., which are regarded as authoritative - A person who behaves in an authoritarian or tyrannical manner. And add to this Michelle’s attempts at dictating social and school food programs and other activities best left to school, parents, individuals, you see a family pattern of radical controlling behaviors.

Speaking of the Mrs. Obama, her earlier years from the past still dictate her thoughts and actions of today when she wrote in her college years “there was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the Black community I was somehow obligated to this community and would use all of my present and future resources to benefit this community first and foremost. My experiences at Princeton have made me more aware of my "Blackness" than ever before.

And if presidents Reagan, Bush or even Clinton had used “all their present and future resources to benefit the “white” community first and foremost” what would be the backlash from that ideology? Would the country blindly follow them into social and economic oblivion whatever the cost to our souls?

In looking at our present times and considering the connection to the past, we see the action of Obama when it comes to the pattern of communication, campaigning, lying, the controlling of the mindset of, and spewing forth the mush to, the ill-informed, misinformed, low information voters. The growth and control that this president, this dictator, has garnered in the realm of social media and the media at large. The “propaganda of change.”

We have only to look back at dictators of the past to see their views as we see it repeated. “Propaganda is vital—the heart of our struggle. We can never abandon propaganda…Use a lot of sleight of hand and smiles with everybody. We must defend our points of view without raising hackles. There will be plenty of time later to crush all the cockroaches.” ~ Fidel Castro, 1955

Hollywood and the youth of America tend to glob onto the ideals and images of heroes, fighters,  revolutionaries against social injustice from the past. One Che Guevara, who they openly promote with not a scintilla of knowledge of truth of his life and actions. Yet they proudly wear his image and subtly fall lockstep into the message. As Guevara said in his diaries in 1958, “Much more valuable than rural recruits for our guerrilla force were American media recruits to export our propaganda.”

And who more than Obama uses propaganda to promote his social issues, his lawlessness, his hatred and distrust, his agenda for the downfall of America? Next time you see the image of Che adorned on the t-shirt or poster of a mindless youth or political activist, ask them if they really know this man was NOT a man of the people. He was not a counter-culture hipster icon and champion of the poor.

He helped free Cubans from the repressive Batista regime, only to enslave them in a totalitarian police state worst than the last. He was Fidel Castro’s chief executioner, a mass-murderer who in theory could have commanded any number of Latin American death squads, from Peru’s “Shining Path” on the political left to Guatemala’s “White Hand” on the right.

He promised a lot and, not only gave nothing, but took from the people that entrusted their lives to him. It was he and not Fidel who in 1960 invented Cuba’s first corrective work camp, or what the Americans would call a slave labor camp - what the Russians called the gulag.

As Guevara wrote to a friend in 1957, “My ideological training means that I am one of those people who believe that the solution to the world’s problems is to be found behind the Iron Curtain.

Ah, behind the iron curtain, a metallic cage opened and closed with a steel cable operated by an iron fist. The land of Stalin, and Marx. The ideals contained in the lives of our current president’s past. For nothing is revealed better then Marx’s belief in the words of Louis Blanc in 1851, “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” Redistribution at its core – at its best. To read and consider  Marx’s Das Kapital,  you’ll see the embodiment of the words of Obama to Joe Wurzelbacher (aka Joe the Plumber) before being elected - that he [Obama] was going to raise his taxes to quote “spread the wealth around."

And to ensure you don’t think this concept of Marxism from the past is lost and limited only to the present administration, and to promote your thoughts for 2016, Hillary Clinton is right in line with the socialistic, communistic traits of the past. In 2010 in the Ukraine she said “One of the problems in societies around the world today is that too much of the productivity of the economies are going to too few. Too few people, the political and economic elite, are realizing the vast majority of benefits from economic activity. It’s true in my own country where, unfortunately, economic inequality is increasing. So part of the challenge of economic growth and prosperity is to make sure it gets down and equally spread among people.”

And her view that “We must stop thinking of the individual and start thinking about what is best for society?” Dangerous for America.

Show us any – ANY – country that has prospered and grown by making the productive people poor, by promising and giving everything to those who choose not to contribute to their societies.

Yes the views of the history, of Communist and Socialist nations, the ideals of dictators and tyrants past, the agendas that drive down productivity and steal freedoms, the rule of ideology instead of law will continue their path of growth in this country if citizens do not look to the past, and learn for themselves that history can repeat itself, IS repeating itself.

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
~ George Santayana (1905)


falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus (false in one thing, false in all)  People exposed to enough proven lies will then not believe the truth. It is therefore imperative to circulate the truth as widely as possible.