Conservative
Governors Find Clever Ways to Fight Vax Mandates
Al Ritter
In a previous article I wrote about the Oklahoma
National Guard and how the new General of that guard had informed the DOD that
they would not be enforcing the vax mandate on any National Guardsmen in their
state.
The legal rangling on this subject has to do with the
idea that while the Oklahoma Guard is operating in their state they become in
fact employees of Oklahoma as their salaries are paid for by the state. If the
Feds activate the Oklahoma National Guard for any reason then are then paid by
the Federal Government and therefore become their employees.
I stated back then that I thought this was only a temporary
fix. The General is still awaiting a reply from the feds on the mandate.
Now Oklahoma Legislature has stepped into the fray
with a much deeper reaching bill that will come up for a vote in the new
legislative session this coming year. Because nobody can sue the Big 3 Pharma’s
for damages done by adverse effects due to the Covid-19 vaccines, the Governor
wants to attack from a different angle.
Gov. Kevin Stitt wants to make ANY entity that forces
the Covid-19 vaccination on its employees as terms for employment be
responsible for adverse effects up to $1 million dollars in damages. Let me say
that again in other words, if your employer threatens your job unless you get
vaccinated and you do in fact take the vaccination and suffer damages because
of it….you can sue that company for up to $1 million dollars.
Now that certainly won’t make you whole again, but it
is one step closer to holding at least SOMEONE responsible for the adverse
effects.
It’s an interesting approach for sure and I hope it
gains traction in the legislature early.
It would sure address some of the National Guard’s
situation in that state too, but certainly not all of it.
Read my past article on National Guards here:
https://alspoliticalview.blogspot.com/2021/12/desantis-reactivates-florida-state-guard.html
Read more about the Oklahoma Bill here:
