Zuckerberg caught in another shady deal, this time with the CCP

Al Ritter

Meta has been using “Llama” an AI program to enhance the Air Force for a few years now, specifically in training aircraft mechanics to work more efficiently. Also this program is used for battlefield planning for the Air Force.

According to a new whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams who was Facebook’s Director of Global Public Policy from 2011-2017, Zuckerberg repeatedly lied to Congress about the use of the Llama program and who had access to it.

In 2014 Zuckerberg had tried unsuccessfully to enter Facebook into the Chinese market. The CCP thought it to be a waste of time and therefore denied it. But Zuckerberg wasn’t finished trying according to Ms. Williams. With the buildup of META’s AI on the horizon Zuckerberg had a trading chip.

If he offered the CCP the same Llama program he could have the wedge he needed to enter Facebook into China. Now according to Ms. Williams China is Zuckerberg’s largest market next to the USA, but at what cost?

If Zuckerberg is handing the same technologies to the CCP as he to the Air Force doesn’t that threaten our national security?

I asked GROK (“X”’s AI program) about Military Contracts to META and this was the reply:

Meta itself doesn’t directly hold military contracts in the way traditional defense contractors like Lockheed Martin or Boeing do. However, Meta has opened the door for its AI models, specifically Llama, to be used by U.S. government agencies and defense contractors for national security purposes. This marks a shift from its earlier stance, where its policies explicitly prohibited using its tech for military applications.

For example, Meta has partnered with companies like Lockheed Martin, Palantir, and Booz Allen Hamilton, allowing them to leverage Llama for tasks like data analysis, cybersecurity, or mission planning. These collaborations don’t involve Meta signing direct contracts with the Department of Defense but rather enabling third parties to use its open-source AI for military-related work. This move has stirred debate, especially since Meta’s tech is open-source, meaning it’s tough to control who else—like foreign entities—might adapt it for similar purposes.

On the flip side, some argue Meta’s involvement is more about staying competitive in the AI race, especially with rivals like OpenAI and Anthropic also eyeing defense applications. Critics, though, worry about the ethical implications of a social media giant indirectly fueling military tech, especially given the lack of transparency around how user data might feed into these models. Still, no hard evidence points to Meta having formal, direct contracts with the Pentagon or other military bodies—it’s more about enabling others to bridge that gap.

 

So there is no denial about META’s involvement in our military with Llama, but where things go astray is who has access to that program.

Read and watch more here:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/whistleblower-drops-bombshell-meta-secretly-aided-china-undermine/

https://www.youtube.com/live/oYx0ZjViYuo

Sen Hawley to request DOJ's involvement:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/sen-hawley-considers-criminal-referral-zuckerberg-demands-testimony/