Al Ritter
The scene in 2014 was a revolt in a way, it pitted the
establishment GOP against the “people.” Those people had enough of the good old
boys’ network and set a course to elect candidates who promised to change the
way things were done in DC.
Although it never really gained a full momentum the
results held the House and retook the Senate. Some candidates have actually
done what they were elected to do under the umbrella of the Tea Party, others
not so much.
We call those who didn’t actually follow the direction of
the Tea Party push, RINOs (Republican in Name Only.)
The Republican side has plenty of mainstream candidates,
ones who borderline on the RINO idea, but as we are finding out, not everyone
identifies with the Tea Party. They are the moderates or independent voters who
see the political landscape as being right center. Most are happy with big
government and just want to see everyone get along.
These same voters like to claim they are tired of the way
government works, but they vote the other way.
Although there are a few candidates who were the darlings
of the Tea Party in 2014, one defected from a stance of no amnesty to working
in the “Gang of Eight” and supporting amnesty along with his democratic
counterparts in the Senate. Another Tea Party favorite has slowly moved away
from the Republican and Tea Party values by taking a decidedly libertarian
stance and now has faded into the same obscurity suffered by his father’s
cultish following.
We have two political outsiders, one of which is a
retired pediatric neurosurgeon. This man is a gentle soft spoken person, he has
lots of good ideas, but his stances and specifics are often muddled to the
point of not really knowing which side of an issue he rests.
The other outsider is a loud brash bombastic businessman,
who uses profanity and vulgar insults at his campaign stops much to the glee of
his rather strange group of followers. He rarely speaks in specifics of how to
fix America’s woes, instead claiming he will “hire the best people” and “you
will really be happy!” His insults and falsehoods rarely seem to be aimed at
the Democratic candidates, but rather at his fellow Republican Candidates.
Only one candidate was elected as a Tea Party favorite
and has done what he promised to do. He has defended the Constitution not only
in the Senate but also in the Supreme Court as Solicitor General of his home
state. He has adhered to the Republican values even when the leaders of his
party seem to have abandoned them.
Has the Tea Party just become a footnote in history and
along with it the values we fought so hard for in 2014? Or do principles, values,
and honesty still matter to the voters who have chosen the Republican Party?
No comments:
Post a Comment