Obama wants to microchip everyone like a dog!

Obama wants to microchip everyone like a dog!
Al Ritter

Here we are as Nancy Pelosi said, let’s just vote on the Healthcare bill and THEN we can see what’s in it! Well Nancy, you got your bill passed, and now we are getting to see what the democrats jammed into it, and I for one am NOT happy.

H.R. 3200 was the bill the senate passed, then the House had to do their amendments to get a final vote, that bill is H.R. 3962, now mind you that H.R. 3962 is ONLY additional amendments to H.R. 3200 not a total replacement . With that being said, unless a specific area was amended, the wording of H.R 3200 stands.

Now for the wording:

Required RFID implanted chip
Sec. 2521, Pg. 1000 – The government will establish a National Medical Device Registry. What does a National Medical Device Registry mean?
National Medical Device Registry from H.R. 3200 [Healthcare Bill], pages 1001-1008:
(g)(1) The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘(B)and is— ‘‘(i) a class III device; or ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.”
Then we go to page 1004 to describe what the actual term “data” means
section B:
‘‘(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘data’ refers to information respecting a device described in paragraph (1), including claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary”

What exactly is a class II implantable device? The FDA says it is an “implantable radio frequency transponder system for patient identification and health information.” The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in medical patients such as “claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary.”

The last part is scary in itself; there are a lot of questions unanswered, such as ……if the data includes “claims data” who updates the information and when? What exactly is a “disparate data environment?” And the biggest question is….will this transponder include a GPS capability?

Don’t believe me? Check out the government site and judge for yourself
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm072191.pdf

Don’t believe it’s in the bill? Look it up for yourself
http://waysandmeans.house.gov/media/pdf/111/AAHCA09001xml.pdf

The areas to look at are pages 1001-1008 listed as “National Medical Device Registry”
Then page 1006 where it stated that this be enacted 36 months of passage
Now go back to page 505 where it refers to the implantable device as “medical device surveillance”

The word surveillance alone speaks to something far more ominous than just claims data
The FDA has said that the recent claims of tumors in dogs who have been chipped are the research responsibility of the implant manufacturers and not that of the FDA because the implants are not considered a drug. So the policing of medical research is left solely to the makers.

America has just become the world’s first country to require micro chipping of all its citizens, and Nancy Pelosi wanted us to follow her in blind trust in passage of this bill, now that we see what is in it, what can we do about it?

Applied Digital Solutions already have the GPS patent on implantable chip technology
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applied_Digital_Solutions

Here is a video explaining this technology





Sources:

http://www.dailypaul.com/node/105079

http://current.com/news/90842279_coverage-under-obamacare-will-require-an-implantable-microchip.htm

http://www.tldm.org/News4/Markofthebeast.htm