Al's Conservative Political Views: June 2022

Wednesday, June 29, 2022

Will Our Military Even Survive?

Will Our Military Even Survive?

Al Ritter

The message is a clear and present danger to America looms tomorrow. Tomorrow is the deadline for the mandatory Covid-19 vaccination for the National Guard. Reportedly 40,000 troops may be dismissed as a result. The message is not only clear on this latest deadline, but in previous deadlines too.

We have lost elite fighting forces in the Seal Community and also in the exclusive Community of Fighter Pilots. Not only were they ejected for not complying with the mandate but the DOD actually floated the idea of suing these individuals for their training!

It was sad to see the Administration take a vindictive stance in forcing them to take a dishonorable discharge, even removing pension benefits that they clearly had earned up to that point.

Now with the new woke management at the DOD HIV patients that are asymptomatic can enlist, but a non-vaccinated recruit cannot.

The military is now struggling to find recruits due to their vindictive punishments in the last two years. With recruitment waning, what will come next?

IMO the draft will be reinstituted it will be the only way the Military can refill the ranks, but at what cost? Does anyone actually think they will be as worthy as the forces they just “let go?”

Watch Video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDgGnMLmKuA

Tuesday, June 28, 2022

Time for a 28th Amendment

Time for a 28^th Amendment

Al Ritter

President Joe Biden soon to be 80

If anything has become painfully clear in the past 18 months is that there needs to be not only term limits but also maximum age limits to hold office. There has always been a minimum age limit to be President but never a maximum age limit, and there should be. Even staunch Democrats are seeing the horror unfolding in front of their very eyes.

Biden’s mental status has been in question before his election, but even Democrats shudder now at his claim that he wants to run again in 2024 for the Presidency. This idea needs to be floated as a bi-partisan issue because who needs a senile President, Speaker of the House or Supreme Court Justice?

I must admit that even at my age, I am experiencing cognitive decline, but coming to that realistic conclusion I sure don’t want 80 somethings making decisions for me, I can make bad decisions on my own thank you!

Nancy Pelosi of the House 82

There are many ideas floating around like the ones mentioned below, but I’d go one step further. The ideas below express that nobody can run for office after 80. My idea is a tad different, if you BECOME 80 in your term you cannot run.

The war cry from the left has always been that the Republican Party is Old White Men, and yet here we are with Joe Biden the Oldest White Man ever to be elected, and he isn’t even 80 yet! You know full well that Bernie Sanders will run again in 2024, because wellllllllll he never gets the memo that nobody likes his age or socialist slant.

I have made a very steadfast view on this issue……….Limits not only the amount of terms but also in age. Certainly the Republicans and Democrats can admit that this needs to be done! Nobody needs an 80 something in charge of the nuclear football!

Justice Breyer 84

Read more here from merely a year ago it seems to be a good starting point:

https://noqreport.com/2021/06/08/proposed-28th-amendment-to-the-u-s-constitution-term-limits-and-age-limits/

Monday, June 27, 2022

Just Another Supreme Court Challenge in the Making

Just Another Supreme Court Challenge in the Making

Al Ritter

Red Flag Laws are in the making in Congress this month because they want to make an end run around the Supreme Court. Three Branches of Government with equal powers seems to mean nothing to a majority of Democrats and a select few of RINOS within the Republican Party.

What do I mean by this? Well if you were paying attention last year in May, the Supreme Court made a unanimous ruling (9-0) and THAT my friends rarely happens! They ruled that the Red Flag Laws are Unconstitutional!

That hasn’t stopped the Congress from trying to make an end run on their decision by passing legislation to start federal Red Flag Laws. What part doesn’t Congress understand?

If this legislation passes it will most certainly waste more of the Court’s time in a future challenge once again!

9-0! Think about that for minute people, when was the last time you heard that all the Justices agreed on something?

It’s no wonder Congress is so disliked.

Sunday, June 26, 2022

When is Rioting and Burning Not an Insurrection?

When is Rioting and Burning Not an Insurrection?

Al Ritter

What is the line to be crossed when protest turns into something very different? Democrats would have you believe that the killing of cops, the burning of Federal Buildings and looting in the North West in 2020 was merely a protest. That the take-over of the Capital Building in 2018 by Democratic protesters at the Brett Kavanaugh hearings where 300 were arrested and quickly let go.

The Liberals show incredible hypocrisy when it comes to “protest.” The Jan 6^th protestors still languish in prison in solitary confinement, while all the Democratic protestors that loot and burn are on a “catch and release” program similar to the illegal aliens that stream over our southern border on a daily basis.

Biden to this day clings to the idea that two police officers were killed on Jan 6^th which is just as blatant a lie then as it is now. In fact two police officers killed the only two unarmed protestors that day and not one investigation as to their murders has been launched.

How can the left see one way when conservatives protest and then turn a blind eye when their side is burning and looting. Was there any burning of the Capital Building on Jan 6^th? Did protestors kill any police? The double standard is incredible. One only has to look at the kangaroo court of the Jan 6^th “Committee,” Nancy’s hand-picked one sided investigation of the events that day only told by Democrats, but not one subpoena issued against a Democrat, including Pelosi.

Biden to this day refuses to condemn and prosecute the protestors in front of Supreme Court Judges homes. Joe still thinks that Roe v Wade was a Constitutional Right, it was never in the Constitution Joe it was a ruling, BIG difference! The reason it was struck down is BECAUSE it wasn’t in the Constitution! Does anyone believe that if the same protest were outside the liberal Justices houses Biden would have them arrested immediately? And Biden claimed he was at the top of his class in law school?

When is enough, enough America? When will this largely silent and so far civil society of Conservatives band together for the goal of eradicating these crooked liberal politicians?

Thursday, June 23, 2022

Huge Gun Rights Win in SCOTUS Ruling

Huge Gun Rights Win in SCOTUS Ruling

Al Ritter

A huge Supreme Court ruling today in a 6-3 decision brought about in a case from New York, gives the right for everyone to secure a CCW permit without out showing a reason other than self-defense. Clarence Thomas authored the majority opinion in the New York State Rifle and Pistol Assoc. v Bruen. Thomas opined that New York’s “proper cause” requirement violated the Constitution prevents law abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their right to bear arms.

Dissenting Judges were Sotomayor, Breyer, and Kagan.

This is a major gun rights win and sure to change the course of states that used the same conditions to acquire a CCW permit such as California, Massachusetts , Hawaii, New Jersey, and Maryland.

EU Forced Sanctions Push the World Closer to WWIII

EU Forced Sanctions Push the World Closer to WWIII

Al Ritter

Not two days have passed since I wrote my last article of where the Russian aggression might spread next, and it turns out I might have been right. The EU after a meeting in Brussels has decided to basically cut off the supply road from Lithuania to the Kaliningrad Oblast area.

In 1993 Russia and Lithuania had signed an agreement to allow such transit of good through Lithuania to the outpost area of Kaliningrad. The items banned will include coal, metals, construction materials, and advanced technologies. I assume that any military hardware would also be banned. Kaliningrad Governor Anton Alikhanov has claimed that these banned materials represent 50% of what his state imports. Now materials may still be shipped from St Petersburg by way of the Baltic but securing those ships may take a while.

The Kremlin has announced that such a violation of the agreement by Lithuania is tantamount to a hostile action against Russia and retaliation will certainly be on the table.

Lithuania is caught between a rock and a hard place here and is now merely a pawn in the strategy game. On one side they had an agreement with Russia and on the other side the EU is forcing sanctions and NATO will have to play along.

At any rate this is a dangerous game of chicken that may play out very badly. Never did I think when I wrote my article two days ago this would come to fruition so fast.

Watch video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDlppxJ1PXU

Update 6/30/22:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10964173/NATO-Madrid-Baltic-nations-demand-new-garrison-50-000-troops.html

Tuesday, June 21, 2022

What Area Might Putin Invade Next After Ukraine?

What Area Might Putin Invade Next After Ukraine?

Al Ritter

To preface this article, I am certainly no expert in foreign affairs, or military strategy, but this is strictly my opinion and nothing more. It certainly makes strategic sense for Russia to make this grab and I will try to explain why.

Putin has made no secret of trying to restore Russia back to the once powerful U.S.S.R. and recapture the former Soviet satellites one by one in the name of annexation to “free Russian speaking people.” His aggression is mortifying to be honest, but his success is startling.

For 22 Years Putin has held power in Russia under the guise of Democratic Election which couldn’t be farther from the truth. In a successful hand off of power to avoid term limitations he has used Dmitry Medvedev as his puppet in which to swap power with trading the President position back and forth.

Ok, on to my prediction, Russia has a small outpost if you will 370km from their homeland, it is on the Baltic Sea and is surrounded by NATO member states of Lithuania and Poland and farther north by NATO countries of Latvia and Estonia.

Basically the Russian outpost of Kaliningrad Oblast sits surrounded by NATO nations. This outpost is of utmost military importance to Russia as it is the home of the Russian Baltic Fleet. Now this isn’t Russia’s only Baltic Port but it is the only Baltic Port that doesn’t freeze over in the winter.

This port is also home to a wide array of ballistic missiles that have a reach all through the Baltic region which if used could give Russia total control of the Baltic Sea.

So you see they certainly have a vested interest in keeping it. This area was once part of Germany during WWII and U.S.S.R. claimed it as the spoils of war in the late 40’s. In the fall of the Soviet Union because of financial restraints this area was offered back to Germany, but Germany refused because by this time all Germans had been replaced by Russians and Germany would have been forced to deal with what to do with the Russian population if they retook the land.

Kaliningrad Oblast is merely 65km from Russian friendly Belarus in a straight line on the borders of Poland and Lithuania. If Russia were to “annex” this narrow 65km border between the Countries of Poland and Lithuania they would effectively cut off three NATO nations from the rest of the world. Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia would be sitting ducks for a later invasion.

Putin might wait and see with Finland and Sweden joining NATO this year. But with his aggressive actions in the past with Georgia, Crimea, and now Ukraine I wouldn’t take this Kaliningrad Oblast connection with Belarus off the table, it would give Putin a direct land link to Russia through Belarus and at the same time severing 3 NATO nations with the world.

The only question I would have is when? Certainly time is not on Putin’s side, with devastating losses in Ukraine of both equipment and personnel it will take some time to rebuild, add that to Putin’s rumored ill health it could be soon or it could be later.

One thing is for sure, you can bet he’s considering it!

Watch the Video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2f9Zf-MDtU

Update 6/30/22:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10964173/NATO-Madrid-Baltic-nations-demand-new-garrison-50-000-troops.html

Monday, June 20, 2022

What Energy Policy?

What Energy Policy?

Al Ritter

Last week Joe Biden explained on the tarmac that he was going to Saudi Arabia not to talk about begging for oil but to talk about “much bigger things.” Biden never explained the bigger things to the press.

Upon arrival he did exactly what we thought, he begged for oil. Now if Biden’s true mission is to reduce the fossil fuel consumption wouldn’t you think he would do it gradually? You know like he did in the with drawl from Afghanistan? I’m sorry that was a tad on the sarcastic side but you get my meaning. But just like the Afghanistan with drawl you can’t do everything immediately. It would be akin to making a heroin addict quit cold turkey.

If Joe’s true aim were to reduce fossil fuel emissions, what difference would it make if the oil were extracted domestically or purchased from abroad? The emissions would be the same either way but we would be using our own resources. It’s been said over and over again that the United States lacks an energy policy under this President. We had an Energy Policy just 2 short years ago and it enabled us to be an oil exporter for the first time in history, now that ability is gone.

Joe has also made fatal errors in the Strategic Oil Reserve. The SOR was designed to be our reserve oil supply in case of war or a natural disaster, not to placate the general public’s demand for cheaper oil. At best if he were to release it all it would only supply extra oil for a few days but would never reduce our actual cost.

Instead of accepting responsibility for the increase in oil price, Joe blames everyone else. He claims that at first it was Putin’s fault, now it’s the gluttony of the Big Bad Oil Companies!

Let’s look at this from the oil company’s viewpoint. Even after purchasing the leases and drilling permits (the later Biden has refused to grant) the oil company has to do much in the way of geological surveys and testing, and even after all that there is no guarantee that they will hit oil. So who bears the burden of an unfulfilled oil well? If they do hit oil they must then find a way to transport it. Pipelines are the easiest, fastest, and safest, but Biden has denied that too. The oil must then be refined (another thing that government has refused to offer new permits for) and then ground transport from distribution centers to individual gas stations.

Sounds like a lot of expenses, speculation, and chances for failure on the Oil Companies part.

Ok let’s look at the cost per gallon 69% goes to the cost of the crude oil profit, refining accounts for 8% , but here is where the REAL greed comes from…..Federal and Local taxes amount to 18%, think about that for a minute, the government gets an 18% take for absolutely no risk, no infrastructure investment. So now this leaves only 5% for transportation and profits!

There is NO other business that survives on a 5% profit margin, and yet Biden claims they are stiffing us! It’s not the oil companies that are stiffing us Joe, it’s YOUR policies and taxes!

Let’s not even get into the idiotic Ethanol Mandate enacted under George Bush, and will seemingly be expanded under Biden as a clean renewable fuel source. What Joe doesn’t tell you how much Ethanol is subsidized by the government. He also claims that increased ethanol mix will lower the price of gas, which is complete hogwash!

Sunday, June 19, 2022

Let’s Delve Into the Second and Tenth Amendments Shall We?

Let’s Delve Into the Second and Tenth Amendments Shall We?

Al Ritter

To preface this article, please understand that I am by no means a lawyer, nor would I ever want to be, but this particular subject has baffled me for decades. I do however have the basic understand of the definitions of specific wording.

Now our Constitution’s first 10 Amendments formed from the Constitutional Convention of 1787 included in that writing were the first ten Amendments known as our Bill of Rights. Later ratified on 1791.

Our forefathers thought that the right to bear arms was so prominent that they placed it directly behind freedom of speech. The only 3 words that seem to be in contention are “A well regulated Militia,” which seems to be the liberal interpretation by the left for the words Armed Forces. If you read any of the Federalist Papers from our founding fathers it is clear that Armed Forces, aka the Army is NOT what they have in mind while drafting the Amendment. As you can see the yellow highlight on the Second Amendment below gives that right to “the people” not just the military, but I digress.

Second Amendment:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Tenth Amendment:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Now the Tenth Amendment seems pretty straight forward to me and of course part of our Bill of Rights also. It basically says that powers not enumerated in the Constitution are to be handled by the States. The intent was clear and plain to give the powers to the states over the Federal Government.

Here is my sticking point about anything on the Second Amendment. IT WAS MENTIONED in the Second Constitutional Amendment and quite clearly I might add, so why do the States have the power to regulate the right to keep and bear arms?

Maybe I’m missing something by not being a lawyer. Why is it that the Supreme Court has only ruled on District of Columbia vs Heller and not the whole idea of “shall not be infringed?”

Update on Second Amendment ;

https://www.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-democrats-react-new-york-gun-law-ruling-161325887.html

Thursday, June 16, 2022

How Many Friends and Family Have You Lost Due to Covid-19?

How Many Friends and Family Have You Lost Due to Covid-19?

Al Ritter

If you think this title has to do with people’s mortality to Covid-19 you would be wrong. I’m not a Covid denier by any means, I’ve had it and it was no joke and the virus killed a lot of people without a doubt. We now know that the claimed deaths tolls were not even close to accurate

But this article is about something just as damaging, I’m talking about the emotional damage it has caused between friends and family. How many of your friends or family have you lost because of your beliefs about the virus?

I have lost one family member over something as silly as the efficacy of masks, she told me that I was a “know nothing” about the subject. Even when the CDC had a peer reviewed randomly controlled trial about how there was no data that confirmed masks did anything to curb the virus. She claimed that it was either fake news, or the researchers didn’t know anything.

Another family member constantly badgered me about my vaccine status, which I considered was none of his business. Not only did he do it but multiple “friends” seemed to consider that same subject about someone else’s vaccine status as something they were entitled to know.

This subject really enflames me because the very thing that has driven the wedge between family and friends can be summed up in one word………GOVERNMENT!

Their lies have been relentless and plentiful. Their aim in this entire Planned Demic has been to divide and conquer. Sadly their plan is still working to this very day.

Some people are still hanging on Anthony Fauci’s every lying word. Some people are still repeating now disproven “facts” about Covid-19.

Meanwhile we have lost friends and family over this virus, some of which will probably never talk to us again.

Very sad folks, we let the government win L

Tuesday, June 14, 2022

Liz Cheney Claims That 2000 Mules Has Now Been Debunked

Liz Cheney Claims That 2000 Mules Has Now Been Debunked

Al Ritter

The two RINOs

Yesterday Liz Cheney, in an effort to remain relevant, claimed that the Dinesh D’Sousa movie 2000 Mules has now been debunked, while witness Bill Barr watched chuckling. She offered no proof of her claim, nor did she produce any tech witnesses to offer proof of her wild claim.

Not only did she offer her personal opinion as “evidence” she clearly misquoted Trumps tweets on that Jan 6^th day. This isn’t a hearing, a townhall meeting, or even a trial, where evidence may be produced from both sides, and cross examination is present, this is a political lynching!

The Democrats even hired a movie producer to edit video footage from that horrific day to remove pictures and video of the only two unarmed people that were killed. This hauls into question the legality of using Congressional funds to advance a one sided political agenda.

The left (including Cheney) keeps promising more damning evidence each day. Sadly the evidence they keep promising is every much a lie as Hillary Clinton’s Russian Hoax.

Watch the video to see how they have manipulated evidence:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTOSbLwBtYI

Read the article here:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/06/jan-6-hearing-liz-cheney-says-2000-mules-debunked-bill-barr-laughs-movie-questioning-wireless-services-ceo-sets-barr-straight-video/

Sunday, June 12, 2022

Enough is Enough, Alejandro Mayorkas Needs to be Charged for Lying to Congress.

Enough is Enough, Alejandro Mayorkas Needs to be Charged for Lying to Congress.

Al Ritter

The past meetings DHS Secretary Mayorkas has had with Congress have done nothing to assure the public of his competence. At times he seems unsure of himself, and at others you can clearly see he seems uneasy as his body language signals that he’s lying.

Thankfully we have whistleblowers that bring forth documents to show he was clearly lying to Congress the day he announced the inception of the Disinformation Governance Board. His intent was to be deceptive about the purpose of this board and now he’s been caught with his hand in the cookie jar. Sens. Hawley and Grassley were presented documents that disputed every answer that Mayorkas made in respect to the Disinformation Governance Board. Mayorkas denied having any knowledge about how the Board was to enforce this so called Disinformation even after he had just signed off on its authoritarian rule.

I suppose things will just go on as normal, with Mayorkas and Merrick Garland lying to the public on a daily basis until the Republicans retake the house and senate when hopefully we can hold all these liars accountable for their actions and hopefully put a few in jail!

Watch Video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDcji_Q45PA

Saturday, June 11, 2022

What Is the Aim of the Jan 6th Committee?

What Is the Aim of the Jan 6^th Committee?

Al Ritter

To make that determination one must first know what kind of “hearing” this is. It’s not a criminal hearing where a Judge is present. This is considered by the government as a “public hearing.” The intent of a Congressional public hearing is to gather all the facts to make a determination if there needs to be a recommendation for criminal prosecution.

As the hearing started parliamentary rules stated that a panel of 9 representatives be named from both parties to participate. McCarthy the minority speaker gets to make that choice from the opposing side, all 5 of his picks were turned down by Nancy Pelosi. In a lame attempt at calling the committee bi-partisan Nancy not only hand-picked members from her own party, but also well-known RINOS from the Republican Party whom she knew would carry her bidding.

Pelosi handpicked Adam Schiff to be one of her party’s panel member. It’s important to remember that Schiff has fraudulently pushed the Russian collusion hoax for over 5 years and still does to this day. It has come to light that he may have been in on the whole Russian lie from the beginning to support Hillary Clinton. Great unbiased panel member huh? Jamie Raskin has no real tenure in politics whatsoever being in office for only 5 years, obviously one that Pelosi has offered big things in the future if he operates under her direction.

This committee has never been about gathering facts for the truth, it’s about expanding the false narrative about a supposed “insurrection.” Only subpoenas were handed to Republicans, mostly from Trump’s Whitehouse. Not one subpoena has been handed to a Democrat, especially Nancy Pelosi. The Committee under her control has flat out told everyone involved that her testimony is forbidden. I for one would like to see her texts and cell phone calls for three days leading up to Jan 6^th.

IMO, I believe that this was a cold calculated plan by Pelosi to create as much havoc on Jan 6^th as possible to tarnish Trump as much as possible.

The Democrats are all complicit in this smear campaign but mark my words, this committee will never advance this to a criminal prosecution, because then there would be rules to follow and foremost “discovery.” Discovery would then force all Democrats through the deposition process which you know would show them in a bad light.

The Dems throw around a lot of terms…insurrection….coup….darkest day in our democracy…..overthrow of our government.

The bigger question is what do you call what Hillary did with the Russian hoax? Insurrection, a coup, or just flat out treason?

What did the Democrats do in 2020? Of course they keep claiming that the election was the most secure in our history, but D’Souza’s movie 2000 Mules has now dispelled that myth. So can that now be considered an overthrow of our government or even a coup?

This whole dog and pony show is about nothing more than a DNC propaganda showing, they really wanted to impeach Trump again but this is the best they could offer.

My mother used to say, “Never point a finger at someone because there is always 4 more pointing back at you.” Her point was never lost on me because in life I have found out that usually the one doing the accusing is the one who is doing the same thing.

Video here fast forward to 5:19:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9KMExbfZH4

Read Here:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/what-if-there-were-gop-appointed-members-of-jan-6-committee

Republican rebuttal video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQaTgNLK4W0

See how the Dems doctored evidence:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTOSbLwBtYI

Friday, June 10, 2022

Biden: I’m Not Unpopular, Just Misunderstood

Biden: I’m Not Unpopular, Just Misunderstood

Al Ritter

Recently Biden’s anger has resurfaced as it normally does when he gets frustrated. In his latest tirade on the Jimmy Kimmel show he told Kimmel that he has done so many wonderful things for the country but it all seems to be lost in bad communication. Well Joe there are two sources of information from the Whitehouse, the first being your Whitehouse spokesperson and secondly it would be YOU. You are the final word in what gets said, so why don’t you fire the person responsible for the bad message?

This week he also lashed out at his staff for correcting or in political speak (walking it back) his gaffes or outright lies. I don’t believe the Whitehouse has to this day corrected his lie about the two police officers he claims were killed by “insurrectionists” on Jan 6^th.

He’s frustrated not only by his own failed policies, but also his plummeting approval rating. Even the most liberal polling companies have him at 41% approval rating. This is dismal to say the least. Right now, NO President has ever had a worse approval rating.

Biden is losing voters in every demographic, even the Latina community.

If Biden’s own Whitehouse staff would just do their own polling to see what the American public thinks on hot button issues they would see he is failing the public on many fronts!

Inflation due to government spending has now set the highest mark in 40 years. Gasoline prices have never been this high. Housing is now unobtainable for a majority of blue collar workers due to the rapidly increasing mortgage rates. His continual support of the unlawful community is certainly baffling. His politicizing of virtually every government agency is not only baffling but borders on totalitarian rule. Fighting a proxy war with Russia through the Ukraine is a dangerous game of chicken that should be avoided at all costs. We can’t afford our own survival at this point, so why are we funding a war half way around the world?

Even Ray Charles could have seen his blatant failures.

Video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDNVaT2bUXc&feature=youtu.be

Wednesday, June 8, 2022

Unchecked Presidential Power? Yes It’s True

Unchecked Presidential Power? Yes It’s True

Al Ritter

Does a President have unlimited power to do what he or she wants in time of “emergency?” According to newly released documents by the G W Bush Presidential Library do to a FOIA request, the answer is yes.

The Eisenhower era formed the PEAD system otherwise known as the Presidential Emergency Action Documents. This group of documents were internally devised by the Executive Branch and drawn up ready to be signed at a moment’s notice by the President in the name of “emergency” or “threats to the U.S.”

You must think that certainly the President would have to involve Congress on these PEADs, but the answer to that would be no! These Documents have been very secretive and classified for decades and have never involved Congress.

Of the 500 pages recently released, they show internal documents of the think tank within the Whitehouse and the melding of ideas about their use. Two striking highlights were, when Bush suspended habeas corpus in the detention of prisoners indefinitely at Gitmo. This PEAD stayed intact until the SCOTUS shot it down near the end of Bush’s term.

Another alarming PEAD being discussed was the silencing of ALL communication by media and possibly the entire internet upon threat or emergency.

If this sounds particularly ominous you are correct in your thinking, flash backs to just 1 year ago over Covid-19 spring to mind. Did either Trump or Biden enact a PEAD over Covid? We may never know as that answer might be classified for decades.

What is certain though is the immense power wielded by the Executive Branch on a purposely broad basis.

Video Here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhZWMLgiOxQ

Monday, June 6, 2022

Who Funds the NGOs That Pay the 2000 Mules?

Who Funds the NGOs That Pay the 2000 Mules?

Al Ritter

As the investigation by the group True the Vote continues the push back increases. As the group continues with personal interviews with the mules themselves portrayed in the movie 2000 Mules, the path to truth becomes more dangerous. Now that True the Vote has delved deeper into voter fraud, the pathway to the adage “follow the money” becomes more apparent.

True the Vote leader Catherine Engelbrecht and her lead research analyst Greg Phillips have uncovered the beginnings of the money trail. Their investigation has lead them path of who funded the balloting boxes depicted in the movie.

By now you have heard the term NGOs and that stands for Non-Government Organizations. Some of the money as we already know was donated by Mark Zuckerberg, but True the Vote has now expanded past that to not only additional domestic funding but also International funding.

This is becoming very disturbing because as MSM has already pointed out, Zuckerberg ALONE spend more than $400 million on the 2020 election just slightly shy of what the DNC spend on the last two elections of $481 million. Now add his expenditure to the supposed outlay of other outside organizations and this becomes a recipe for disaster.

True the Vote is hinting that this funding is being done by the very same groups that brought Barack Obama to power and are now pushing Stacey Abram’s campaign forward.

It seems strange that these NGOs (usually 501C groups that aren’t allowed by law to participate in anything political) are the driving force in the illegal ballot harvesting schemes. Why aren’t they being investigated? How do they continue to do things that are against the law? Isn’t there any State Attorney’s General ready to revoke their 501C status and seek jail terms for the violations?

True the Vote Group is now being threatened constantly and as Greg Phillips has stated “we are all carrying now.”

Finally someone is exposing the dark side of ballot harvesting and who is funding it. Understand these are clear violations of voting laws and no matter which political side is responsible this HAS TO BE STOPPED!

No matter which side of the aisle you are on, you should want fair elections plain and simple, we need to get to the bottom of it and fast!

View the Video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoRp9PpiNQE

Friday, June 3, 2022

Trudeau Just as Out of Touch with Problems as Biden

Trudeau Just as Out of Touch with Problems as Biden

Al Ritter

In another clueless week Justin Trudeau makes as much sense in his speeches as Joe Biden. While railing against handguns, banning sales, transfers of handguns and magazines over 5 rounds, saying that everyday Canadians have no need for such things in normal life.

No sooner did he announce that than he signed legislation allowing the possession of 2.5 grams of Cocaine, Fentanyl, Heroin or Methamphetamine. Gun deaths are at an all-time low in Canada, but drugs are the leading cause of death in 19-39 year olds in Canada, but Trudeau chooses to ban handguns?

Trudeau isn’t much better than Clueless Joe in his communist thinking logic, both of them have the same aim, to disarm their citizens then destroy their respective countries by anarchy.

Watch the Video here:

https://dailycaller.com/2022/06/01/tucker-carlson-canada-guns-fentanyl/

Thursday, June 2, 2022

Second Biggest Hoax Played on Our Citizens

Second Biggest Hoax Played on Our Citizens

Al Ritter

I was driving home yesterday and in a short 3 mile drive from the beltway I started counting Teslas coming from the other direction. I passed 16 Teslas in such a short distance. Now to preface this article I do live in a largely liberal area, and to be honest the Toyota Prius has fallen out of favor here. Hybrids are no longer the way to go as the liberals gobble up all the fully electric vehicles they can, but mostly the expensive Teslas.

Oh the first biggest hoax? Covid-19 vaccinations, but that's for another article.

This is no knock on Tesla or Elon Musk, in fact I’m a huge fan of his. He is finally the voice to make the libs see the errors of their ways. Musk has previously stated that 100% electric cars in America can never be achieved because the grid can’t handle it. Liberals all think that Electric cars are the “clean fuel” alternative to fossil fuels. Logic thinking minds know better, the electric has to come from somewhere. Two alternatives Fossil fuel burning electric plants or nuclear energy. Solar power can help a little but the increased number of panels to make charging your car and powering your home a reality is cost prohibitive.

Instead liberals buy a car that has a basic range of let’s say 400 miles which means to can only travel 200 miles from your home without the ability to charge at your home. Charging at home is of prime importance here. The electric rate that you negotiated with your power company at say .08 cents a KWH is not available outside your home. Charging stations that are popping up seemingly everywhere are charging anywhere from .18 cents a KWH to .28 cents a KWH depending on the speed you want to charge your car.

Hybrids make far more sense because they now have incredible MPG and they aren’t limited by the distance you can travel and they certainly cost less than the Tesla.

Follow with me here a little on the remote charging scenario. Once the State and Feds discover that they are no longer collecting road tax on gasoline on electric cars……how long before they start taxing the KWHs on remote charging stations. After all a politician never saw a tax they didn’t like!

Wednesday, June 1, 2022

The Judicial System in America has Become a Joke.

The Judicial System in America has Become a Joke.

Al Ritter

The judicial system in America used to be an unbiased, non-political entity that was used to enforce the law equally. Rarely anymore do you see a Judge Recuse him or herself from a case because of political bias. Such was the case of Judge Christopher Cooper an Obama appointee for the district Court of Washington DC. Obviously he didn’t recuse himself in the trial, even though there may be eventual Obama fingerprints on this whole Steele dossier subject.

The jury was anything but a jury of Sussmann’s peers. What they were is totally Hillary Clinton biased. One potential juror remained on the jury after being questioned, “Do you think you can render an unbiased decision after being a Clinton donor?” Her reply was, “I suppose so if I have to.” She was allowed to stay on the jury. Is this fair to stack the jury with not only this woman by also others that were Hillary donors?

Was the jury told that the Clinton Campaign and the DNC had already been fined $113,000 for their part in the Steele Dossier scandal? The FEC didn’t have to go through an entire trial to levy their fines, it was painfully obvious!

Durham was never going to receive a fair shake in this kangaroo court in Washington DC the heart of the swamp. Even after Judge Cooper tried to limit the scope of this trial to just Sussmann’s lying, but Durham was much more skillful in this regard. Durham has now exposed and implicated the FBI, CIA, and the DOJ in this whole Russian Collusion hoax.

Remember, this is a Durham investigation, that encompasses many avenues of corruption, and he’s already shown light on how corrupt and totally biased the government has become under Democratic rule.

Hopefully he can prove in the future that the Steele Dossier had more fingerprints on it than just Hillary’s. Remember that Obama’s VP at the time of the incident was Joe Biden, and if you think he is devoid of any knowledge of the dossier, then you also believe he never discussed with Hunter Biden his business dealings.

Wednesday, June 29, 2022

Tuesday, June 28, 2022

Monday, June 27, 2022

Sunday, June 26, 2022

Thursday, June 23, 2022

Tuesday, June 21, 2022

Monday, June 20, 2022

Sunday, June 19, 2022

Thursday, June 16, 2022

Tuesday, June 14, 2022

Sunday, June 12, 2022

Saturday, June 11, 2022

Friday, June 10, 2022

Wednesday, June 8, 2022

Monday, June 6, 2022

Friday, June 3, 2022

Thursday, June 2, 2022

Wednesday, June 1, 2022

Blog Archive

Get on the email list!

Translate to your language

search the blog archives

Al's YouTube channel for the DIY'rs

Copyright infringement

Use agreement of copyrighted articles

About Me

Readers comments

Comments Policy

My Personal Beliefs ( so you know where I'm coming from)

Disclaimer