No End in Sight on Debt Talks

No End in Sight on Debt Talks
Al Ritter


Both Democrats and Republicans are doing their political posturing as the deadline for the debt talk’s loom. Asian markets today are showing their apprehension as trading drops.


Obama and Harry Reid are holding steadfast to raising the debt ceiling along with saddling America’s wealthy with a larger portion of tax liability to fund the ever increasing social programs the democrats see as necessary. John Boehner is holding to his position of no additional tax increases in a time of economic uncertainty. There is no assurance that even if the debt ceiling talks yield a compromise that the world’s monetary rating group will not downgrade our AAA rating to AA. Even if Obama and Reid raise taxes and the debt ceiling, Moody’s could still see that as a weakening of the dollar and reduce the rating.


Obama refuses to negotiate any social programs for cuts, including the new high speed rail he just proposed recently. He has also refused to negotiate on past programs and entitlements. Obama has argued that America has spoken that 80% of citizens agree with raising the taxes, despite a recent
Rasmussen Poll that says only 37% agreed with the president. When Obama was a US Senator and Harry Reid served in the senate under George Bush, both of them vehemently battled against raising the debt ceiling at that time. Now the situation is more dire, and the democrats continue to spend us farther into a hole, but somehow their opinion on the debt ceiling has changed.


Logical Americans know that spending more money when you are in deep debt makes no sense. The issue is not that we have a tax deficit; the more accurate way to portray the situation is that we have a spending problem, and we are running out of wealthy people to tax. The words “fair share” is being sadly abused when 51% of Americans pay NO tax, and yet the wealthy are being forced to pay for the non-payer’s existence, is this the true meaning of the words “fair,” or “share?”


If you are a democrat reading this article, here is an enlightening glimpse into the programs the Republican’s see items ripe for removal thus saving America 2 1/2 trillion dollars………….Democrats have already said no to deleting any of them. To the Republicans reading this article, this is what the Obama Administration sees as “negotiation.”


a.. Corporation for Public Broadcasting Subsidy. $445 million annual
savings.
b.. Save America's Treasures Program. $25 million annual savings.
c.. International Fund for Ireland. $17 million annual savings.
d.. Legal Services Corporation. $420 million annual savings.
e.. National Endowment for the Arts. $167.5 million annual savings.
f.. National Endowment for the Humanities. $167.5 million annual
savings.
g.. Hope VI Program.. $250 million annual savings.
h.. Amtrak Subsidies. $1565 billion annual savings.
i.. Eliminate duplicative education programs. H.R. 2274 (in last
Congress), authored by Rep. McKeon, eliminates 68 at a savings of $1.3
billion annually.
j.. U.S. Trade Development Agency. $55 million annual savings.
k.. Woodrow Wilson Center Subsidy. $20 million annual savings.
l.. Cut in half funding for congressional printing and binding. $47
million annual savings.
m.. John C. Stennis Center Subsidy. $430,000 annual savings.
n.. Community Development Fund. $4.5 billion annual savings.
o.. Heritage Area Grants and Statutory Aid. $24 million annual savings.
p.. Cut Federal Travel Budget in Half. $7.5 billion annual savings
q.. Trim Federal Vehicle Budget by 20%. $600 million annual savings.
r.. Essential Air Service. $150 million annual savings.
s.. Technology Innovation Program. $70 million annual savings.
t.. Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) Program. $125 million
annual savings.
u.. Department of Energy Grants to States for Weatherization. $530
million annual savings.
v.. Beach Replenishment. $95 million annual savings.
w.. New Starts Transit. $2 billion annual savings.
x.. Exchange Programs for Alaska, Natives Native Hawaiians, and Their
Historical Trading Partners in Massachusett ... $9 million annual savings
y.. Intercity and High Speed Rail Grants. $2.5 billion annual savings.
z.. Title X Family Planning. $318 million annual savings.
aa.. Appalachian Regional Commission. $76 million annual savings.
ab.. Economic Development Administration. $293 million annual savings.
ac.. Programs under the National and Community Services Act. $1.15
billion annual savings.
ad.. Applied Research at Department of Energy. $1.27 billion annual
savings.
ae.. FreedomCAR and Fuel Partnership. $200 million annual savings.
af.. Energy Star Program. $52 million annual savings.
ag.. Economic Assistance to Egypt. $250 million annually.
ah.. U.S. Agency for International Development. $1.39 billion annual
savings.
ai.. General Assistance to District of Columbia. $210 million annual
savings.
aj.. Subsidy for Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. $150
million annual savings.
ak.. Presidential Campaign Fund. $775 million savings over ten years.
al.. No funding for federal office space acquisition. $864 million
annual savings.
am.. End prohibitions on competitive sourcing of government services.
an.. Repeal the Davis-Bacon Act. More than $1 billion annually.
ao.. IRS Direct Deposit: Require the IRS to deposit fees for some
services it offers (such as processingpayment plans for taxpayers) to the
Treasury, instead of allowing it to remain as part of its budget. $1.8
billion savings over ten years.
ap.. Require collection of unpaid taxes by federal employees. $1 billion
total
savings.WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
aq.. Prohibit taxpayer funded union activities by federal employees.
$1.2 billion savings over ten years.
ar.. Sell excess federal properties the government does not make use of.
$15 billion total savings.
as.. Eliminate death gratuity for Members of Congress.
at.. Eliminate Mohair Subsidies. $1 million annual savings.
au.. Eliminate taxpayer subsidies to the United Nations
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. $12.5 million annual savings
av.. Eliminate Market Access Program. $200 million annual savings.
aw.. USDA Sugar Program. $14 million annual savings.
ax.. Subsidy to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD). $93 million annual savings.
ay.. Eliminate the National Organic Certification Cost-Share Program.
$56.2 million annual savings.
az.. Eliminate fund for Obamacare administrative costs. $900 million
savings.
ba.. Ready to Learn TV Program. $27 million savings..
bb.. HUD Ph.D. Program.
bc.. Deficit Reduction Check-Off Act.
bd.. TOTAL SAVINGS: $2.5 Trillion over Ten Years

Gov. Brewer Forced Into Recount of Author of SB 1070

Gov. Brewer Forced Into Recount of Author of SB 1070
Al Ritter


A recall count has normally been reserved for those despicable politicians who either broke the law or participated in a horrible breach of conduct after their election. Republican voters still view it that way, but times may be changing.

It seems now that disgruntled Democratic voters see a vote or a policy that is not to their liking as grounds for a recount. They view the vote itself as a horrible breach of conduct, and the trend is rapidly spiraling out of control.

Gov. Brewer ordered the vote to recall Republican Russell Pearce, the state senate's president and chief architect of Senate Bill 1070, after a citizen's group turned in enough valid signatures to force it (catch phrase here is “citizen’s group”…….aka Democrats.)

7700 signatures were required to force the recount, and 10,000 were received, forcing the first recount in Arizona’s history. Their fight will be an uphill battle as Russell Pearce has been elected 16 times to the Arizona legislature. He claims that the effort was headed by money and out of state staff to head off the bill deemed so unpopular by Democrats country-wide.

"We believe that Senator Pearce's agenda and behavior is too extreme for Arizona," the group “Citizens for a Better Arizona” said in a statement to Reuters late on Tuesday.

This latest attitude of Democrats mirrors the actions of their President……”If you don’t play by my rules, I’m taking my ball and going home.” They surely need to grow up!

The Smoking Gun Document

The Smoking Gun Document
Al Ritter

Eric Holder testified to a congressional committee that he only knew about Operation Fast and Furious after the deadly shooting of an American border patrol agent in Mexico. We are now finding out that the Operation Fast and Furious was run under the larger umbrella of Operation Gunrunner.


Eric Holder had no problem extolling the wonderful benefits of Project Gunrunner to the Mexican government in April 2009 when he claimed that, “My department is committing 100 new ATF personnel to the Southwest border in the next 100 days to supplement our ongoing Project Gunrunner, DEA is adding 16 new positions on the border, as well as mobile enforcement teams, and the FBI is creating a new intelligence group focusing on kidnapping and extortion. DHS is making similar commitments, as Secretary Napolitano will detail.


Just the fact that Holder is claiming glory for Operation Gunrunner tells me that he knew intimate details of Operation Fast and Furious also. Operation Gunrunner was a hold-over from the Bush era, but Operation Fast and Furious was instituted by Obama alone. It seems ludicrous to assume that a program that came into being in the Obama Administration was totally unknown to Eric Holder, and appointee of Barack Obama’s who has oversight over the department of the ATF.


So proud of his role in Operation Gunrunner, that Holder actually placed it on the internet for all to see on the Department of Justice website. Now I want to know when the committee will hand down indictments to Eric Holder for lying to the subcommittee investigation or worse yet indict him for his part in the contributing factors to manslaughter of a Federal agent


http://www.justice.gov/ag/speeches/2009/ag-speech-090402.html

The Tragedy of Caylee Marie Anthony

The Tragedy of Caylee Marie Anthony

Louis Lazarus

Please click on this link or paste it into the URL and listen to this song before you read this article.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1OEmxHvcGw&feature=related

Below are the lyrics to this song.Baby mine, don't you cry.Baby mine, dry your eyes.Rest your head close to my heart,Never to part,Baby of mine.Little one when you play,Don't you mind what they say.Let those eyes sparkle and shine,Never a tear,Baby of mine.If they knew sweet little you,They'd end up loving you too.All those same people who scold youWhat they'd give just for the right to hold you.From your head down to your toes,You're not much, goodness knows.But you're so precious to me,Sweet as can be,Baby of mine.All those same people who scold you,What they'd give just for the right to hold you.From your head down to your toesYou're not much, goodness knows.But you're so precious to me,Sweet as can be,Baby of mine.Baby of mineAbove you have just read about the essence of motherhood.

This beautiful song sung by Alison Krauss. expresses the joy and love a mother feels for her child. A mother will do anything for her child include give up her own life. It is instinctual. Mothers love, nurture and protect their children and God help anyone who tries to harm that child when the mother is nearby. Should that child disappear, a mother would be frantic and do everything in her power to get her child back. She wouldn’t wait one day and in most cases she wouldn’t wait one hour. No mother would wait for 31 days.

We have all gone through an emotion roller coaster known as the "Casey Anthony Trial". It is the story of a two year old little girl whose skeletal remains were found wrapped in a black garbage bag and tossed in a swamp. The remains had duct tape on the nose and mouth. After sitting through a trial which lasted about six weeks, most of us were convinced that the prosecution presented enough evidence to warrant a conviction of murder. We thought for sure when the jury read the verdict Casey Anthony would be found guilty of at least one count of murder or at the least manslaughter.

Instead, we got the shock of our lives when the jury found her innocent on all counts except lying to law enforcement. Then the fireworks began. Many of the TV talking heads claimed the prosecution botched the case and didn’t present the burden of proof required for a conviction. We heard them say nobody knew how Caylee died so how can the mother be convicted of murder? We also heard them say Casey was a good mother. We also heard them say even though her behavior was bad, erratic, unusual and clearly not that of a normal mother, it isn’t against the law and wouldn’t be enough to convict her of murder. Yes, we heard all kinds of excuses as if these TV talking heads lost their minds as well as all common sense.

Bill O’Reilly was outraged at the verdict. Sean Hannity and Geraldo Rivera thought the jury got it absolutely right. Clearly somebody is wrong. It is my opinion that the prosecution did everything correct and the jury got it wrong and I will explain why. I am not an attorney but my brain functions perfectly well and somehow my common sense hasn’t left me even though the whole world seems to have gone mad. Here’s what I think and after this explanation, I will also let you know what I believe really happened.

But first, let’s examine what we know for sure. We know for an absolute certainty that a two year old little girl was murdered. She did not die of old age and she did not die of some terminal disease. She was found with duct tape over her nose and mouth inside of a black vinyl garbage bag and in a swamp. This is not debatable. It is evidence that she was indeed murdered. If someone is murdered then there has to be someone who did the murdering and that person is by definition the murderer.

We can safely say that all 7 billion people on this planet are innocent of this murder except for one person. The other 7 billion all have an alibi as to where they were and what they were doing on that fateful day. For example, I was 3000 miles away in my home state of California. I played golf that day. I talked to everyone in my town and they also had very credible alibis and no means or motive to do the crime. After spending some time contacting everyone else in the world, it can now be said beyond a reasonable doubt that everyone else in the world is also not guilty of this crime. I even double checked Iran, Yemen and Saudi Arabia and believe it or not, everyone there is innocent. However, that still leaves one person with means, motive and opportunity who has no alibi. We are talking about Casey Anthony, the little girls mother. Casey had means, motive and opportunity and she was the last person to see Caylee alive. Therefore, if there was a murder…and there was….and if everyone else in the world can be accounted for except one, that leaves only one person in the whole wide world who could have committed this crime. That person is Casey Anthony. It just is. It would be unreasonable to think she didn’t do it.

The jury got the verdict wrong because they wanted video tape, 30 or 40 eye witnesses, DNA supplied by CSI: Miami’s David Caruso, a signed and notarized confession and a verbal admission of guilt by Casey Anthony. Expecting all of this is unreasonable. The term "beyond a reasonable doubt" clearly applies and the jury should have come back with a guilty verdict. They just should have.Here’s what I think happened and then you decide if this is reasonable. We will never know the truth. Remember that! Once found not guilty, Casey Anthony can never be tried for this crime again as that would be double jeopardy which would put her life in danger twice and that is against the law.

We know Casey Anthony was a spoiled, dysfunctional and irresponsible young woman who loved to party. She lived to enter "Hot Body Contests" and frequent clubs, drinking and dancing well into the night. This was what she did often. It wasn’t something she did once or twice a year. Partying was something she loved to do. But, she was a single mother with a baby. Casey had little money and could not afford a baby sitter so it would make sense that she took Caylee with her at night and Caylee slept in the car while Casey partied. We all know children are different and they can be unpredictable. Some children are always quiet. Some children are always noisy. Some children are quiet sometimes and noisy other times. I believe that Caylee, after several of these nights, would start to cry and make noise and Casey couldn’t have that. She couldn’t have a crying baby in her car while she was dancing and drinking. This was interfering with her social life. She had to figure out a way to keep her quiet and make sure she slept.

With the Internet being what it is, she was able to do a search on chloroform, how it works and even how to make it. I would bet one of her friends suggested a little chloroform would knock Caylee out for a few hours and she would sleep until Casey was ready to go home. This is most likely how she got the idea but it is also possible she thought this up on her own. The chloroform worked once or twice but Caylee didn’t like it and feared it. She cried and put up a fuss and perhaps Casey didn’t get to party "that" night. Expecting this would happen again , Casey thought a little duct tape would do the trick. It would muffle the crying. So, the next night, off they both went to the club and Casey used the duct tape as well as the chloroform. Unfortunately, something went horribly wrong and between the duct tape blocking the nose and mouth somewhat and possibly too much chloroform, Caylee was not able to breathe and she suffocated. Casey returned to find her little, inconvenient baby girl dead in the car and went into panic mode. How could she explain this to the police? What could she possibly say? They would find out she used chloroform and that would be it. And, that was it. We all know the rest.. Lie after lie. Body in the trunk of the car decomposing. Backing the car up at night next to the dumpster to hide the smell.. Put the body in a garbage bag and tromped off into the swamp to hide the body. Afraid to report what she had done because now it was even worse than it was originally.

I do not believe Casey planned to kill her child but what she did at least amounted to manslaughter, negligent homicide or even murder in the second degree. When we talk about reasonable, this is about as reasonable as it can get. This scenario covers everything that happened. Everything fits. Everything now makes sense, doesn’t it? The problem is, with our justice system, we will never know. Who will cry for Caylee? Listen to "Baby Mine" one more time and I will bet you will. I know I did.

Entitlements Aren’t Always About Social Programs

Entitlements Aren’t Always About Social Programs
Al Ritter


Maybe it’s just me, but in the last few years I find it easier and easier to tell a liberal by their actions rather than a declared stance. I wrote an article a few years ago about the “Y” generation and explained the entitlement mentality of these young adults.


They would be the ones who regularly go to the “12 items or less” checkout lanes in the grocery store with 40 items in their basket, and then pay with a check. They are the ones that butt into line when they see someone they know at a concert. They are the ones who wait until the last minute to merge on the beltway and cut you off while doing it. They are the ones who cut in front of you in the gas station line while you have been waiting 20 minutes to get to that same pump.


They are the ones who constantly talk about sacrifice, but in no such uncertain terms do they want to sacrifice anything of their own for some “noble” cause. They are the ones who expect regular raises when they have just been hired by the same company that you have been working for a decade with no raises.


They are the ones who drive only the most expensive cars, live in the biggest houses and show off everything about their existence, but are never more than 4 paychecks away from being homeless. They quite plainly are the “posers of the world.” They are the ones whose opinions are worth the most, whose material objects are the best, and everything you have is mundane.


They are the ones who talk the game about charitable giving, but never give to anything or any group. They are the ones who think that government is here to take care of everyone. They think that YOU make more money than you need, and therefore you should be giving more to charity (aka the government) because only they know best on how to distribute it to the poor. They are the ones who don’t believe in god and therefore the idea of letting churches distribute things to the poor is a bad idea.


They are the ones who feel entitled to our money, our time, and our way of life without working a day for it. Somehow these people think that what they have is theirs and what we have is theirs too! They are the ones who run for office and promise the steal from the rich and give to the poor…….and that has to be the correct thing to do right?.................Well it worked for Robin Hood!

Innocent Until Proven Guilty

Innocent Until Proven Guilty
Al Ritter

I am sure that I will get hate mail on this article, but it is based on our judicial system and how it works. Please understand that I am saddened by this horrible death, and just as much upset about the fact that justice hasn't been served. We may however disagree on the amount of evidence needed for a conviction. I personally believe that there should be more than circumstantial evidence to convict someone of first degree murder........with that being said.....my article.

The Casey Anthony trial has been a media frenzy to say the least, but the backlash from Monday morning armchair quarterbacks has been laughable to say the least. People from all walks of life and backgrounds seem to have an opinion, whether or not they are based on the premise of our judicial system. Everyone seems to have such a firm grasp of the law, even though they never went to law school. Everyone feels qualified to decide Casey's fate because they "watched the trial on TV." The fact is that viewers saw everything, even things that the jury wasn't allowed to see due to law. Televising a trial can be one of the worst things to do as far as swaying public opinion, because the public can draw uninformed conclusions they may not otherwise, had they been picked as an actual juror.

From the very beginning of Casey’s arrest the prosecution tried to taint the jury pool with wild and unsubstantiated claims, forcing the trial to a neighboring district. Claims have been made about what an incompetent attorney Jose Baez is and some of that may be true, but the fact remains that it is up to the prosecutor to PROVE that Casey Anthony was guilty in some way shape or form for the death of her daughter.


The state brought charges of first degree murder, and then covered all their bases with varying degrees of manslaughter in hopes of a conviction, which they didn’t get. No matter what you think of Casey, or her family, the facts remain that the state brought NO material evidence into court to convict her. Not blood evidence, not DNA evidence, not fingerprint, not one single witness, and what does the American public expect from a purely circumstantial case?


A case based purely on circumstantial evidence is nothing more than a theory….one person’s opinion on how the death happened, plain and simple. Is the American public that blood thirsty that they want to see Casey put to death for something that hasn’t been proven? Would you want that to happen to one of your family members?


Is Casey responsible for something that happened that fateful day?................probably…….do her parents know more than they are saying?.....probably……..did the state prove anything by circumstantial evidence?…….., no. Is Casey Anthony a good person?.........I don’t think so, but we need more for a conviction than being a bad person.

It saddens me that a child’s life has been snuffed; it saddens me even more that the State of Florida would come into court with a first degree murder charge with such little evidence. Has Caylee’s death been prosecuted to the best of the state’s ability…….I am afraid not.


So in closing I have to say, if you want to be mad at someone over the prosecution of Casey Anthony, be mad at the State Prosecutors office in Florida, they came to the fight with NO material evidence…….because everyone in our country is innocent until proven guilty…….it wasn’t the defense’s job to prove she was innocent.

Maybe someday in the future her judgment day will occur either by civil trial or by god himself.......but the prosecutor had his day in court and failed and nobody answers for the death of a beautiful little girl.

Divide and Conquer/ or Rule as Defined by a Politician

Dear Patriots:
Divide and Conquer/ or Rule as Defined by a Politician



A way of keeping yourself in a position of power by making the people under you disagree with each other so that they are unable to join together and remove you from your position; historically a small minority have continued to govern by a policy of divide and conquer.



If ever “We the People” were to unite as we did in 1776 we would easily restore Constitutional government and regain our Freedom.



I remember when Khrushchev banged his shoe on a table and declared “we will burry you.” That image still haunts my memory. Communist techniques for conquering are rooted in subversion. Their conquest of our nations roots of capitalism and self sufficiency are, and have been successfully undermined, not by force, but by patient long term planning.



The United Nations is, was, and always has been Communisms most important tool in the taking over of America and its unique most honored institutions. It is neither more nor less than a rotten core of subversion, a haven for security risks, and disbursements of World Government propaganda into our school systems, especially our Universities.



The UN is nothing more than a Communist led organization instituted for the overthrow and control of America and the World. The average American today seems to passively embrace the ascendancy of the Federal Government with its attendant Bureaucrats and regulators smothering every facet of our economy be it our medical systems, to full-body pat downs at our airports, our citizens seem eager to participate in a rush into full-blown socialism.



The process of subversion, corruption and compromise of liberty continues at an ever frightening pace as America is seduced into submission by selfish success, and an unwillingness to sacrifice, or hazard all in the fight against organized evil.



Common Sense, faith in God, love of country have taken a back seat to greed, selfishness, backstabbing, and worse ever, a moral decadence in our society, you read about it in the news, see it on the television, in the movies and reverberating from mouths of many of our young men and women every day. It represents nothing more or less than a sickening decay of our society.



Too many people are willing to sell their souls for whatever government promises them in terms of security. It is all a lie.



FDR and all of his promises in the early 1930s, up to and including the Administrative and Procedures Act which followed the “New Deal” have led America’s people down a rotten path of dependency. The people either knowingly or unwittingly, voluntarily by subversion, or coercion have accepted communist socialism; regardless its means, it was all done by design. It should sicken each of us to have been so deceived.



My call is to Wake Up. Put off the chains of slavery, kick all the fleas and lice out of political office in 2012, start anew, read, understand, and embrace Constitutional limited government. It is in fact the Law of the Land. Amendments to this document are not necessary and would only dilute its actual powers to control those elected to Federal Government.



We need a moral awakening to the truth that we celebrate today, God gave us rights, no man and no government ever gave us anything but slavery, and tyranny, hence the need to control them with the “chains of the Constitution.”



God grant us the strength, the will, and the moral certitude to prevail in this quest; that we might be a blessing not only to ourselves, but most especially to those who follow after us. Seek after God, for “I will walk at liberty; for I seek thy precepts.” Psalms 119:45. In this precept we can be united.

Barack Hitler Obama?

Barack Hitler Obama?
Kevin Bryant

History has yet to determine if Adolph Hitler was a genius or just certifiably insane. I can sit here and make a strong argument for either side of the debate. In many ways, the same argument can be said about Barack Obama. There are many things that are similar about the lives of John F Kennedy and Abraham Lincoln. There are many things similar about the lives of Barack Obama and Adolph Hitler.

Hitler was born in Austria and was elected to the highest office in Germany. Obama was born somewhere but to this date the debate is not yet settled on exactly where to being elected President of the United States.

Hitler was an average student at best. Obama was an average student at best.

Hitler used thug tactics and labor unions to amass power. Obama used thug tactics and labor unions to amass power.

Hitler believed in a strong central government and once in power placed people in positions to circumvent the German congress and secure that power. Obama believes in a strong central government and placed people in positions to circumvent congress to secure more centralized power.

Hitler had his “Brown shirts” to do his dirty work once in power. Obama has the AFL-CIO, SEIU and ACORN to do his dirty work once in power.

Hitler appointed Rudolf Hess, a man with no morals, as his number 2 person in the Nazi party to ensure everything he did was deemed legal regardless of the truth. Obama appointed Eric Holder, a man of no morals or ethical standards, Attorney General to deem every action taken by his administration would be deemed legal regardless of facts.

Hitler hated England because of Germany’s defeat in WWI. Obama hates England because his grandfather was imprisoned and tortured by England.

Hitler surrounded himself with hardline socialist like Hermann Goring, Wilhelm Keitel, Otto Dietrich and Josef Mengele. Obama surrounds himself with socialist and communist like Andy Stern, Richard Trumka, Cass Sunstein, Kathleen Sebelious and John Holdren. Nope, not much difference in either list.

Hitler killed over 6 million Jews. The Obama administration supports the Muslim Brotherhood whose sole purpose is to destroy Israel and every Jew living there and create one Middle East Muslim nation.

Actual historians know that Hitler would have never been able to rise to power had it not been for the failures of Herbert Hoover or the deeper plunge into depression brought on by the actions of Franklin D Roosevelt. Obama would not have been elected had the mainstream press actually vetted him to any degree that they did Romney, Huckabee , McCain, Palin or even Hillary Clinton.

Hitler took a country that had been devastated economically and brought it to the brink of greatness before destroying it by means of war. When Obama came into office the US economy was fragile but not broken. His attempts to destroy the U.S. economically have inflicted damage but have yet to break the back of capitalism. Try as he might, he will not be able to create his socialist utopia, go down in history as a savior of a nation or even remembered in history as a better than average president because capitalism will find a way to survive.

It took Hitler 6 years to fundamentally transform the German nation. Obama promised to fundamentally transform the United States of America. President Obama, I believe when you leave office you will come as close if not closer to transforming this nation than either Teddy or Franklin Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson or even the likes of Nixon, Carter, Clinton and Bush 43 combined. It will take decades to rebuild that which you will have destroyed in a mere 4 years.

Upon emerging from the constitutional convention which formed the basis for our government, Ben Franklin was supposedly asked by a woman outside the hall, "Mr. Franklin, what kind of government have you given us?" To which Franklin replied, "A Republic, madam, if you can keep it."

I have faith in America. We have tough times ahead, but I do not yet think America has seen her greatest hour. I may not live to see it, but I have the strongest of convictions that my children and grandchildren will.

Obama Puts Israel on New List as "Protecting Terrorists"

Obama Puts Israel on New List as "Protecting Terrorists"

Al Ritter


When Obama was running for the office of President, he promised to rebuild the U.S.’s reputation in the world. Unfortunately in the months following his inauguration he has continually insulted our allies and friends alike. It is no secret how the President has treated our longtime ally Israel from the beginning.

Unfortunately for us the Obama Administration has stepped to a new low. The State Department has issued a new list “specially designated countries” it believes “have shown a tendency to promote, produce, or protect terrorist organizations or their members.” On that new list is Israel, and just as mysteriously North Korea has disappeared from that list.

In an effort to calm over tensions from the report ICE spokeswoman Gillian Christensen stated that,
“Even though the administration includes Israel among “specially designated countries” that it believes they have shown a tendency to promote, produce, or protect terrorist organizations or their members,” the U.S. also considers Israel, as well as some other countries on the “specially designated countries” list, as partners in the struggle against terrorism.

“The U.S. does not and never has considered Israel to have links to terrorism, but rather they are a partner in our efforts to combat global terrorism,” Christensen said in a written statement. “Countries may have been included on the list because of the backgrounds of arrestees, not because of the country’s government itself.”

You do not put a country on a list described as to “have shown a tendency to promote, produce, or protect terrorist organizations or their members.” And then offer a disclaimer to say in Israel’s case it has to do with the background of arrestees. Isn’t this like blaming the victim?

ICE says that most of the countries on this list are there because of the percentage of Muslim population in that country. But didn’t President Obama say we aren’t at war with Muslims? Israel has a Muslim population of 16%, but the fact remains that Israel’s name was JUST added to the list based on the same prerequisites as were used in 2008 when the last report was made.

The Administration didn’t give much of a reason for removing North Korea from that list despite the saber rattling of Kim Jong Il in the last two years, but I suppose he doesn’t offer any threat because of a low Muslim population.

The Disturbing Hate Trend

The Disturbing Hate Trend
Al Ritter

In much the same way that President Clinton taught the youth of America that oral sex was not sex at all, America is being taught a new lesson from liberals. In a disturbing new trend favoring Palestinians, liberals are sending a message to our youth that it is ok to hate Israelis. Guilt by association then bleeds over to Jews worldwide and the new trend of anti-Semitism has taken hold.

The Nazi like tactics of the old world Muslim religion is gaining traction in progressive countries of Europe as well as America. It now seems somehow “hip” to hate a particular group of people. Hate groups are nothing new or different; the neo-Nazis have been in existence in America since the early fifties, but in the 90’s and into the millennium their numbers had dwindled. Now there seems to be a resurgence in the popularity of these hate groups.

As a result of Barack Obama’s sharp criticism of Israel the liberal public is quick to jump on that bandwagon once again as they did in 1938 starting another dangerous downward spiral of hatred that almost killed a nation for 5 decades. The word Nazi is so polarizing in Germany it is against the law to even use the word. The shame their citizens feel for the actions of one mad man is etched in their memory forever.

With many countries now feeling the expansion of the Muslim religion and the subsequent creep of Sharia law the push is on once again to somehow extinguish the rich tradition of the Jewish people. Why do they see this as necessary? Why is hatred being tolerated and even expanded by our President? How can the world be so intolerant of one religion of people? How can another religion preach hate in their “holy book?”


I fear that the world is once again going down that ugly road once travelled by an insecure ego maniac from Austria.

http://news.yahoo.com/glenn-beck-family-encounter-hostility-nyc-224805047

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/upshot/disturbing-trend-neo-nazi-codes-203345626.html

Delta Airlines Become First Sharia Compliant American Carrier

Delta Airlines Become First Sharia Compliant American Carrier
Al Ritter


Ex-congressman Fred Grandy (Gopher from the Love Boat TV Show) and his wife have stumbled onto a business deal between the American carrier Delta Airlines and Saudi Arabian Airlines. That in itself is fine, but what followed is the enforcement of a concerted effort of bigotry by Saudi Arabian Airlines and the country of Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia Airlines has told Delta that a direct flight to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia would of course require either a travel visa or work visa, neither of which would be given to declared passengers of Jewish ancestry. Delta then deferred the bigoted policy back to Saudi Arabia, saying that those were the policies of the host country and they weren’t responsible for the requirements.

The very fact that Delta entered into an agreement with full knowledge of the policies beforehand is proof that they are complicit in the discrimination of Jews. This business agreement should never have been made, regardless of who is responsible for the bigotry. Once the policy is known the agreement should have been cancelled.

I know for one, I will never fly Delta Airlines after this declaration of the creeping Sharia in our United States by a backward uneducated “religion of hate.”

Listen to the radio show that brought this to the news:

http://www.talk1200.com/cc-common/mediaplayer/player.html?redir=yes&mps=interviews.php&mid=http://a1135.g.akamai.net/f/1135/18227/1h/cchannel.download.akamai.com/18227/podcast/BOSTON-MA/WXKS-AM/062211MrandMrsFredWEB.mp3?CPROG=PCAST&CPROG=RICHMEDIA&MARKET=BOSTON-MA&NG_FORMAT=&NG_ID=&OR_NEWSFORMAT=&OWNER=&SERVER_NAME=www.talk1200.com&SITE_ID=14220&STATION_ID=WXKS-AM&TRACK#

Purposely Testing the Waters

Purposely Testing the Waters
Al Ritter

To set the stage for you, I live in Maryland, one of the so called sanctuary states for illegal aliens. My state has been controlled by Democratic legislature since 1959, and shows NO inclination to chance in the near future. I grew up here, but due to the downturn in the economy and housing market, I will stay until that reverses.

I have been writing about the political climate for over 3 years now, and have amassed an archive of over 1600 articles to say I study and research each and every subject would be an understatement to say the least. To meet me in a social setting, you would never know that I do such work. I rarely talk about politics outside my blog or social networks.

A friend who has a few inklings about my background tested the waters last night, while we were in a social setting. His questioned me as to the state of political affairs in Maryland. I basically told him that the RNC had signed off Maryland as a total loss many years ago and in fact some representatives of the Maryland Republican Party where Democrats themselves, not three voting cycles ago.

I told him that Maryland will not be a two party state for many years into the future, because “as the country goes, Maryland never follows.” Anyone who lives in Maryland sees the truth in my statement whether they be a democrat or a republican. His reply was very similar to person testing the temperature of the water before going in for a dip. He said, “Is it necessary to have two parties in Maryland, or wouldn’t it just be better to have two opinions?” I chuckled to myself at his question, but I answered it in a way that surprised him I believe.

His question assumed that one party could run the state as it does now, but that more moderate voices within the Democratic Party would be heard. That hasn’t happened in Maryland, in fact Maryland has moved farther left in the last 3 voting cycles, so his inference is a moot point.

My answer to him was this….. “A two party system is necessary everywhere in the United States and especially in Maryland. Because each party has it’s extremes it takes at least two parties to even out those extremes. Each party should be heard and eventual compromises should be made. Partisanship has replace bipartisanship, because of one rule party states, and that is no formula to move forward in our country.”

I think he was shocked by my answer because it didn’t indicate to him that I wanted total control for the Republican Party, but rather a shared experience……….so very UNLIKE the leaders in Maryland.

Human Sacrifice is Still Being Used Today!

Human Sacrifice is Still Being Used Today!
Al Ritter

Human sacrifice is still alive and well in Washington as Eric Holder and Barack Obama prepare Kenneth Melson, acting head of the ATF for the ceremony. Obama will insulate himself as far away from the action as possible by using Eric Holder as the hatchet man to force Melson to resign the office he was never confirmed to head, the ATF. No person has been formally confirmed by the Senate to head the ATF since 2006. So contentious is that seat that proponents of both sides of gun bans have tried to be named, but nobody ever confirmed.

Melson himself is an enigma of the Chicago political machine who hates guns. Sort ironic, isn’t it that someone who hates guns of all types is in charge of the very department that oversees guns. Melson will be the first casualty of Operation “fast and furious” the illegal transportation of weapons into Mexico to be put in the hands of the drug cartel.

Two leading Republican Congressmen have been leading the investigation of operation and have been continually stonewalled by Eric Holder over subpoenaed documents about the operation that ended in the death of one of our own Border Patrol Agents. Rep. Issa publicly lambasted Eric Holder over the redacted documents that he finally submitted. When finally submitted upon threat of the DOJ being held in contempt, each subpoenaed document was conveniently blacked out over 90%. Rep. Issa told Holder that he should be ashamed of himself over the blatant disregard for subpoena. The hearings have so far produced nobody who has claimed responsibility for the approval of the operation. Someone is going to have to answer for this illegal operation that ended in the death of a federal agent.

This is just one more classic example of the contempt the Obama Administration has for the Constitution, specifically the Second Amendment. This was an action from the very start to paint guns as a bad thing to make it easier to ban ALL guns from the American people the same way they are banned in Mexico. The most ironic part of this whole situation is that since Obama’s inauguration gun sales have skyrocketed and violent crime has actually declined! It just goes to prove that gun ownership is a deterrent to crime not the other way around.

Obama will once again slither his way from touchy situation of governmental abuse, but you can bet on one thing, Eric Holder has got to know that HE is next in line for sacrifice after Melson!

Father’s Day, Different Things to Different People

Father’s Day, Different Things to Different People
Al Ritter

In the most elemental form Father’s day celebrates the role of the paternal parent. Whether or not that role is celebrated by the child is entirely up to the past history. We can have lots of role models in our lives, but generally the role of the parents is the closest to the heart of the children.

There can be many people referred to as “Father” and it doesn’t necessarily have to be a father by birth right it can be an adopted father, but generally the title is held by the male figure that raises the child, offers the love and support that nurtures that child. Of course on the other hand it can merely mean a sperm donor who never really gave much of a hand in raising the child, but the child holds a false celebration as to that father’s role even if they only share a skin color.

The term father can also be used in lots of ways to describe a term of endearment……. “father in heaven” to describe god…….. “Father O’Malley” to describe your priest……… “forefather” to describe the founding fathers of our country………. “step father” to describe that special man that raised you……. “father-in-law” to describe your wife’s father (ok maybe not all are terms of endearment…lol), but you get the idea!

I was never very close to my Father, but that doesn’t mean I can’t respect him for the sacrifices he made for me, or the respect I had for his success in business. Dad had a work ethic that was overly enthusiastic to say the least, and that is where our contention laid. I still miss him, not much on a daily basis now but I still miss him on father’s day and around the holidays. So this weekend, dad, even though you have been gone for 12 years I’ll be thinking about you.

I hope my son thinks about me a few times this weekend, and I hope his son is thinking about him too! Happy Father’s day to ever guy out there who has made a difference to a child that means the world to him!

Immigration Problems Supported by Facts not Emotion

Immigration Problems Supported by Facts not Emotion
Al Ritter

I received this email from a friend today, and although I had never read this particular article I was curious as to its validity so I did some investigative work and found that #1 There is a Tina Greigo, and she does write for the Denver Rocky Mountain News, and yes she did pen this article. From her other articles I found her to be compassionate about the plight of the illegal immigrant issue, and as you will read, this article is based solely on facts not a subjective empathy or social injustice……..JUST facts. I have found this article has circulated well in its past 4 years, and although some of the links are dead, collaborating evidence can be found on those dead links. The number of illegals in this country has grown substantially since 2007 and accordingly the cost per year has gone up too. In short I have found this article to be real and accurate for its original date but needs readjusting for an accurate portrayal of today’s situation.

This clearly shows the need for “immigration reform,” and not just an open door policy encouraged by the Obama Administration. Clearly an amnesty policy will not fix the wrongs already in our country, and a concise plan needs to be drafted.

With that being said, here is Tina’s article in it’s entirety.

Tina Griego, journalist for the Denver Rocky Mountain News wrote a column titled, 'Mexican Visitor's Lament' -- 10/25/07.

She interviewed Mexican journalist Evangelina Hernandez while visiting Denver last week. Hernandez said, 'They (illegal aliens) pay rent, buy groceries, buy clothes...What Happens to your country's economy if 20
million people go away?' That's a good question - it deserves an answer. Over 80 percent of Americans demand secured borders and illegal migration stopped. But what would happen if all 20 million or more vacated America?
The answers may surprise you!

In California, if 3.5 million illegal aliens moved back to Mexico,
it would leave an extra $10.2 billion to spend on overloaded school systems, bankrupt hospitals and overrun prisons. It would leave highways cleaner,
safer and less congested. Everyone could understand one another as English became the dominant language again.

In Colorado, 500,000 illegal migrants, plus their 300,000 kids and grand-kids - would move back 'home', mostly to Mexico. That would save
Coloradans an estimated $2 billion (other experts say $7 billion) annually in taxes that pay for schooling, medical, social-services and incarceration costs. It means 12,000 gang members would vanish out of Denver
alone.

Colorado would save more than $20 million in prison costs, and the terror that those 7,300 alien criminals set upon local citizens. Denver Officer Don Young and hundreds of Colorado victims would not have suffered
death, accidents, rapes and other crimes by illegals.

Denver Public Schools would not suffer a 67 percent drop-out/flunk-out rate because of thousands of illegal alien students speaking 41 different languages. At least 200,000 vehicles would vanish from
our gridlocked cities in Colorado
Denver 's four percent unemployment rate would vanish as our working poor would gain jobs at a living wage.

In Florida, 1.5 million illegals would return
the Sunshine State
back to America, the rule of law, and English.

In Chicago, Illinois, 2.1 million illegals would free up hospitals, schools, prisons and highways for a safer, cleaner and more crime-free experience.

If 20 million illegal aliens returned 'home' --

If 20 million illegal aliens returned 'home', the U.S. Economy would
return to the rule of law. Employers would hire legal American citizens at a living wage. Everyone would pay their fair share of taxes because they
wouldn't be working off the books. That would result in an additional $401 Billion in IRS income taxes collected annually, and an equal amount for local, state and city coffers.

No more push '1' for Spanish or '2'
for English. No more confusion
in American schools that now must contend with over 100 languages that degrade the educational system for American kids. Our overcrowded schools would lose more than two million illegal alien kids at a cost of billions in
ESL and free breakfasts and lunches.

We would lose 500,000 illegal criminal alien inmates at a cost of more than $1.6 billion annually. That includes 15,000 MS-13 gang members who distribute $130 billion in drugs annually would vacate our country.

In cities like L.A., 20,000 members of the ' 18th Street Gang' would vanish from our nation. No more Mexican forgery gangs for ID theft from Americans! No more foreign rapists and child molesters!

Losing more than 20 million people would clear up
our crowded
highways and gridlock. Cleaner air and less drinking and driving American deaths by illegal aliens!
America’s economy is drained. Taxpayers are harmed. Employers get
rich. Over $80 billion annually wouldn't return to the aliens' home
countries by cash transfers. Illegal migrants earned half that money untaxed, which further drains America’s economy - which currently suffers an
$8.7 trillion debt.

At least 400,000 anchor babies would not be born in our country,
costing us $109 billion per year per cycle. At least 86 hospitals in California, Georgia and Florida would still be operating instead of being
bankrupt out of existence because illegals pay nothing via the EMTOLA Act.

Americans wouldn't suffer thousands of TB and hepatitis
cases rampant in our country-brought in by illegals unscreened at our borders.

Our cities would see 20 million less people driving, polluting and
grid locking our cities. It would also put the 'progressives' on the horns of a dilemma; illegal aliens and their families’ cause 11 percent of our
greenhouse gases.

Over one million of Mexico 's poorest citizens now live inside and
along our border from Brownsville , Texas to San Diego , California in what the New York Times called, 'colonias' or new neighborhoods. Trouble is, those living areas resemble Bombay and Calcutta where grinding poverty, filth, diseases, drugs, crimes, no sanitation and worse. They live without sewage, clean water, streets, electricity, roads or any kind of sanitation.

The New York
Times reported them to be America's new ' Third World ' inside
our own country. Within 20 years, at their current growth rate, they expect 20 million residents of those colonias. (I've seen them personally in Texas
and Arizona; it's sickening beyond anything you can imagine.) By enforcing
our laws, we could repatriate them back to Mexico
We should invite 20 million aliens to go home, fix their own
countries and/or make a better life in Mexico . We already invite a million
people into our country legally more than all other countries combined annually. We cannot and must not allow anarchy at our borders, more anarchy
within our borders and growing lawlessness at every level in our nation.
It's time to stand up for our country, our culture, our civilization and our way of life.

Interesting Statistics. Here are 14 reasons illegal aliens should
vacate America , and I hope they are forwarded over and over again until they
are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them:
1. $11 billion to $22 billion dollars are spent each year on welfare
to illegal aliens. http://tinyurl.com/zob77

2.. $2.2 billion dollars are spent each year on food assistance
programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal
aliens. http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html

3. $2.5 billion dollars are spent each year on Medicaid for illegal
aliens. http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html

4. $12 billion dollars are spent each year on primary and secondary
school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of
English! http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
5. $17 billion dollars are spent each year for education for the
American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

6. $3 Million Dollars PER DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal
aliens. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

7. 30% percent of all federal prison inmates are illegal aliens.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

8. $90 billion dollars are spent each year on illegal aliens for
welfare & social services by the American taxpayers.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.html

9. $200 billion dollars per year in suppressed American wages are
caused by the illegal aliens.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

10. The illegal aliens in
the United States have a crime rate that's
two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0606/12/ldt.01.html

11. During the year 2005, there were 4 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens
that crossed our southern border with as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from terrorist countries. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroine,
and marijuana crossed into the U.S. from the southern border.
http://tinyurl.com/t9sht

12.. The National Policy Institute estimates that the total cost of
mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion, or an average cost
of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period.
http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute..org/publications.php?b=de...

13. In 2006, illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances
back to their countries of origin. http://www.rense.com/general75/niht.htm

14. The dark side of illegal immigration: Nearly one million sex
crimes are committed by illegal immigrants in the United States!'
http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml

The total cost is a whopping $338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR!!!

24,000 Emails and what was found?

24,000 Emails and what was found?
Al Ritter

The left and the lame stream media tried to enlist all rabid Palin haters to pour over recently released emails from the time Sarah Palin was governor of Alaska. It seems that even a pile weighing in at 275lb was not too daunting a task for the group that claims her as “too stupid to be president.” Bent at proving the past governor is somehow corrupt, the left was willing to any length to expose her, forget the fact that Palin hasn’t declared she is running for anything.


A week later and what have they found?.....not one single incriminating document has been found. The funniest thing about this quest for the left’s “holy grail” is that no such hunt has ever been allowed on Barack Obama, not when he was in the Illinois State Legislature, not as a US Senator, not as a candidate for president. In fact when can you remember a time when ANY democrat has had 24,000 emails reveled from a time they were in public office?


It seems funny to me the hypocrisy that the left uses for stunts like this to expose what they think to be corruption, but when none is found they never apologize for the imposition they have put the person through, but then when asked to reciprocate and offer the same thing for one of their own (such as Obama,) the chances of obtaining those same documents for that person are slim to none.


But such is the way of the democrat, “succumb to my demands, but never shall I succumb to yours.”

Think about this folks………let’s tell Obama….Palin showed us hers, now show us yours………

Please no Anthony Weiner jokes now!

How to Not Burn a City!

How to Not Burn a City!
Louis Lazarus

Anybody with a brain and who is half way paying attention already knows Obama has released his Birth Certificate or Certificate of Live Birth. Henceforth, known as “the FBC” or Fraudulent Birth Certificate. If you have a body temperature over 60 degrees and the ability to come up with the answer to two plus two, you have figured out the FBC is fake. Jerome Corsi has written a wonderful book called “Where Is The Birth Certificate” and he makes the case without a shred of doubt that Obama is an illegally elected president because he is not a Natural Born Citizen by any definition of the term. In fact, it is more than likely his parents weren’t even married and he was indeed born in Kenya. Without regard, it cannot be proven that Obama was born from Two American Parents and that disqualifies him from even running for the Office of President. However, at the moment, president he is. Millions of us patriots know this cannot stand and we already know not only was the FBC a total joke, but the fact that Obama endorsed it as being authentic makes him complicit to a felony. Rather than point to gobs and gobs of links proving the FBC is indeed fake, I want to discuss why so far nothing has been done. For those of you who still maintain the document is real, simply go to www.youtube.com and type in the search window “adobe illustrator and birth certificate. That’s all you have to do. Pick out three or four random videos and watch and listen to people who are proficient in the two graphics programs, Adobe Illustrator and Adobe Photoshop, explain how this document was put together. We were told it is a scan of the original and you will see for yourself just how phony it really is. If you are still in doubt, go to any search engine such as www.google.com or www.ixquick.com and type in “Obama and birth certificate and fake” and yet more evidence will come up. Then, after doing all this, ask yourself if all these people are lying or could it possibly be Obama is lying. If you can’t come up with the right answer, you are indeed brain dead and beyond redemption. You have put yourself in the sub-human defective class where no matter what is presented; you will always believe Obama is “the real deal”…which he is not.

Knowing all this you now have to proceed to the next step. This requires some logical reasoning along with some clever deduction. If Obama is indeed a fraud and shouldn’t be the president, why is there nothing being done about it? Millions of us are asking that same question. Many, but not all, have come to the same conclusion on that perplexing problem. Why is Obama still there? The answer is simple and if you haven’t figured it out, here it is in a nutshell. It’s called “racism” and it’s not what you think. It isn’t the white man being prejudiced against the Black man; it’s just the reverse. If Obama is removed from the Office of President, there will be rioting in the streets. Cities will burn. There will be social unrest, as we’ve never seen because American’s first Black president will have been removed by “whitie”. Blacks will not believe, nor care, that Obama violated the Constitution. They will see this as strictly a race issue. That is what the people in power are afraid of and that’s why it looks like nothing is being done. They may be right, those people in power. It is quite possible our cities will burn and there will be rioting. Do we want to really take that chance or is there a better way to follow the Constitution and still get Obama out of office? I think there is.

Would it not make sense that the Obama Administration knows their time is up? They aren’t stupid. They know if they want to push this issue, they will lose and many of them will go to jail. Many of them participated in this charade. They falsified documents and withheld information and those are crimes punishable by jail. If this were to go “that” route, the end result would be jail time for Obama, Pelosi and many others. They are culprits in a crime and a cover up. During this process of hearing the evidence, again…riots may ensue. We just don’t know.

Is there another solution? Is there a way to get Obama out of office, have him do no jail time and yet comply with the U.S. Constitution? The answer is a simple “yes”. Here’s my theory. Obama knows he has to go. He has told Fox News and all the conservative pundits to “keep a lid on it” for a certain amount of time while they get their story together. This criminal administration has to come up with an organized and believable way to leave office. Obama has to have an excuse to resign. What that excuse might be, I do not know. I’m sure he is demanding to save face. He might blame the Republicans for standing in his way and preventing him from doing the “first class” job he was elected to do. He might say if he can’t do something 100%, he just can’t live with himself so he is going to resign. This is just my opinion but it makes sense. It makes more sense than Fox News, Rush, Hannity, Ingraham, Beck and Levin along with many others not mentioning the FBC. They have to know it is indeed phony. If we know it, they know it. The deal is to sit on this story while Obama plans his exit. That makes sense to me but I’m not sure if everybody will agree. We do know Jerome Corsi can’t get on Fox News. How likely would that be in “normal times”? Here is a man who has written a book with enough evidence to get the president of the United States of America removed from office. Why would Fox News not want to interview this man? Look what he already did with John Kerry and the Swift Boaters. Corsi’s credentials are without reproach and his research is without fault. There is something in the works. If it’s not this, I’m not sure what…but something is going on. As of today, June 8, 2011, we have not seen Obama on TV telling us what to do or what’s he’s done or what he’s going to do for a few days now.

It must be killing Rush, Hannity and the gang to not be able to talk about this. I remember a few nights ago when Michelle Malkin was on with Hannity and the birth certificate issue came up and they quickly brushed it aside as if it didn’t even exist. If my theory isn’t correct, and Obama remains in office, we will have lost our country. It would mean the Constitution is no longer valid and the Supreme Law of the Land. I refuse to believe there are people in very high places that would allow this to happen. Let’s hope, for all our sakes, Obama is gone…and soon.

Anthony Weiner has Many Problems, but Serving Constituents Shouldn’t Be One of Them

Anthony Weiner has Many Problems, but Serving Constituents Shouldn’t Be One of Them
Al Ritter

In yet another sex scandal by a congressional servant, but this time we have a notoriously combative narcissist who views every interview as another opportunity to do battle. Anthony Weiner has many psychological problems, stemming from narcissism, but ending in sexual insecurities.


I wouldn’t fault him for seeking psychiatric help for his problems, but his pathological lying is certainly not what his constituents need or want. In his press conference he was apologetic for the first time, he was humble to a point, but lapsed right back into his narcissistic self as the press conference went on.


He has always shown certain anger to anyone that disagrees with him, and shown a childish trait of wanting to scold an interviewer when the questions take a turn that he doesn’t like. For some reason the Democratic Party seems to like these traits and at first was trying to defend him. Pelosi’s actions yesterday took another turn, as she filed to have Weiner’s action heard by the ethics committee. Pelosi and Reid are preparing to throw Weiner under the proverbial bus.


The blatant disregard for his wife of just 5 months shows that he doesn’t care who he tramples to get what he wants. His wife has a very public life as Hillary Clinton’s assistant, and this can be just as damaging to her, as it can be to him. Weiner’s narcissism was challenged yesterday as he admitted his lies to the press, but make NO mistake it was his narcissism that made him announce that he was not resigning. He will never do that, his nature won’t allow it; he will have to be dragged from his seat kicking and screaming.

I’m confused Mr. President, could you please answer a question for me?

I’m confused Mr. President, could you please answer a question for me?
Al Ritter

If Russia, or Iran, or Afghanistan, or say Cuba was invading our southern border, would you defend us? Then why sir are you avoiding the situation and ignoring the very thing you swore an oath to do? During your inauguration you promised to uphold the Constitution and to protect the citizens of this country, and yet during your 2 ½ years in office you have done neither!

You have continually violated the Constitution that the conservatives of this country hold dear. You view the Constitution as a “living document”……..aka a moving target, and yet most of the American people view it as the laws that govern us. You refuse to admit that according to even the liberal MSNBC online poll that 96% of America agrees with the Arizona law against illegal aliens. Why is it that WE see the need for Arizona to protect themselves when you won’t? Why is it that the Arizona law mirrors the federal law that YOU refuse to administer?

We see Americans being killed on their own property, while you insist on apologizing to a critical Mexican President. We see American citizens being denied the ability to even visit the Arizona areas south of Phoenix because of the Mexican drug lord invasion of our country.

What country has to invade us before we react to repel the invasion? Is any one country worse than another?

Our President has shown through his actions in the past 2 ½ years that he wants to multi task, by shoving every social initiative down our collect throats, and yet he can’t seem to address an invasion of our country!
You wanted this job sir, now act like a leader and do something about it or we will find someone who will!

Why Does Obama Claim Support of Israel Then Support the Palestinians?

Why Does Obama Claim Support of Israel Then Support the Palestinians?
Al Ritter

The Obama Administration has held a cold shoulder to Israel since the inauguration. They have basically shut Israel out of the intelligence loop since day one, and although they claim allegiance to Israel, their actions say something different.

The rising anti-Semitic sentiment is nothing new in the Arab world, but it seems that it is on the rise in America. Once again the barbaristic attitude against Jews is reaching the same crescendo that it did in 1938. The bigotry and hatred shown by Hitler has been replaced by the Muslim world as they continue to paint the Palestinian people as the victims, rather than the oppressors.

Quality of life for Palestinian people under Israeli rule has increased according to the Palestinian Authority's Central Bureau of Statistics. As demonstrated here:

According to the report, Israeli control over Judea and Samaria has had an
enormous positive impact on civil infrastructure and improved accessibility to
basic resources like water and electricity, as well as opening the region to the
Israeli labor market, which has brought a significant increase in
GDP.

Quality of lifeThe situation of the Palestinians today is better off
than the Arab citizens in many measures, including: The percentage of
expenditure on food, the percentage of expenditure on housing, private ownership
of houses, ownership of mobile phones, Internet accessibility, population,
literacy rate and longevity.

GDPIsraeli 'Occupation' between 1967 and 1993,
after which the PA began administering sections of Judea and Samaria under the
Oslo Accords, resulted in a rise in per capita GDP from 904 to 3392 NIS. Under
the PA this number dropped to 2293 NIS.

Water supplied almost all Arab
communities in Judea and Samaria with water pipes between 1967 and 1993,
bringing the number of homes with indoor plumbing to 90%. The total water supply
doubled from 64 million cubic meters a year to 120 million as a result of
improved water access.

Life expectancy Arabs in Judea and Samaria have seen a
steady increase in life expectancy from 54 to 74 since 1967, close to that of
Israelis, and higher than the median life expectancy of 65 in most Arab
countries.

Literacy rates 92% of Arabs of Judea and Samaria are literate,
compared to a median of 67% for the Arab world as a whole.

Internet
penetration 55% of Arabs in Judea and Samaria, benefiting from Israeli high-tech
infrastructure, have internet access - a figure significantly higher than almost
all Arab nations today.

Prefer Israel 58% of Arab residents in East Jerusalem
prefer to continue living under Israeli sovereignty rather than being annexed to
PA control.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/144681?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=facebook

It seems clear that the “oppressor” label given to the Israelis holds no credible claim. If the claim were true it seems ridiculous that the oppressor would first increase the quality of life for the oppressed first.
Maybe our president should read this report BEFORE his idiotic demand to return to the Israeli borders of 1967!