Obamacare confirmed by Conservative Chief Justice

Obamacare confirmed by Conservative Chief Justice

Al Ritter 

Chief Justice John Roberts is a turncoat? He had to know that Kagen should have recused her own vote but refused. Why did he turn his back on the majority of America and the very party that elected him? 

I am shocked and dumbfounded as well as the majority of Americans who wanted this travesty repealed. What swayed the conservative Chief Justice to ignore the stick in the eye that Obama and his cronies have constantly poked in the last three years? Constant violations of the Constitution haven’t been enough for this jurist? Forget the fact that he is the lead Supreme Court Judge, wouldn’t he already know that Justice Kagen was the solicitor general and had argued the case FOR Obamacare on the Whitehouse side and SHOULD have recused herself in this matter. 

He had to know that by not recusing herself the Obama Administration would already have a handicap in favor of the issue! 

He voiced his concern about taking money from Medicare, but yet basically gave his ok………….really?......Why would he do such a thing? Basically it appears that either the liberals have gained another vote…..OR….his vote was for sale plain and simple! 

We are sunk America! Unless Romney pledges to revoke this law in some way or shape the voters have now been denied what they want to the whims and wants of one Supreme Court justice and the senate.

Face it folks, unless we take the senate by a decisive margin, it makes NO difference what the Congress votes to repeal this heinous law it WILL stand! Our only saving grace would be Romney, but his pledge to repeal Obamacare will fall on deaf ears..not sure if he can repeal it by Executive Order or not….I KNOW he can’t veto it after the fact……it’s time for the law experts to step forward and tell us about the options! Judge Napolitano……….what say you?

Lacking any further explaintion I have to ask Chief Justice Robert............what IS the cost of a vote of a Supreme Court Chief Justice these days?

Slacker!

Slacker!

Al Ritter 

Ok Ok, I’ll admit it, I’ve been a slacker! I have been occupied working on my house lately, and to be honest I’ve been pretty disgusted with what I’ve been reading about Obama and his band of criminals surrounding the Whitehouse. This whole stonewalling from the Whitehouse on the investigation of “Operation Fast and Furious” in which Holder has lied several times on whose watch this program was created is totally infuriating to me. 

As of today he has refused to supply 70% of the subpoenaed materials. It would be one thing if it was true that Darrel Issa were on a witch hunt, but the facts remain that he IS the standing chairman and investigative head to monitor illegal and questionable actions of government. The death of a border agent is anything BUT a witch hunt! It’s past time (over a year) and the Terry family has no closure and even fewer answers about who or who’s responsible for their son’s death. 

Holder basically begged Obama to invoke Executive Privilege to keep 70% of those documents hidden. Holder tried to craft a deal with Issa to provide him with information (spoken) but not the actual documents subpoenaed material with the return promise to drop the entire investigation! Issa declared there was a no deal and moved to level a Congressional Contempt charge vote as early as next week. 

Even bipartisan members want answers, and they will surely get them at some point. If the Congress levels a vote of contempt of congress, the next move will be to have him criminally charged. Whether or not this gets that far, one can bet that not only is Holder’s position in question, his entire future livelihood be in question.  

The $64,000 question is why did Obama step in and not only involve himself in this controversy, but invoke Executive Privilege when the information requested didn’t involve National Security issues? Democratic pundits seem to think that this won’t make a bit of difference in the November election. I disagree…..I think the closer we get to the election people will remember his most recent lies and cover-ups. If you add this HUGE misstep to all the past lies……………and if the Supreme Court shoots down Obamacare and upholds Arizona’s SB 1070, you will see a real game changer as some of his base will surely erode, and some of those “undecideds” vote to unseat him! 

Soon I will be back in full force for November, but until then, keep your powder dry, and ready the pitchforks!

Dear Patriots

Dear Patriots: 

Grant Burmer

     Some years ago I was able to store an original copy, or text, of the Proclamation for the 1849 California Constitution.  At the time of its publication for ratification the official delegates were located in Monterey.  Brevet, Brigadier General Bennett Riley was then, Territorial Governor of California, with headquarter in San Jose.

     The process of Ratification by the People of California took place in November 1849 and by the first week of December election returns started coming in. On January 2, 1850 General Riley resigned his commission and turned his responsibilities over to the newly elected Legislature. 

    Of interest are the following tidbits:

Article I.  Entitled, Delcaration of Rights

Section:  1. All men are by nature free and independent, and have certain inalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing and protecting property: and pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness.

     For those who may have forgotten, or did not know:  inalienable means “incapable of being alienated, surrendered or transferred, rights granted to us by God.  These rights indeed, have been made subject to the whims of the very government we have formed and ignorantly turned over to them. Dare I mention the Franchise Tax Board, Unions and other Power Brokers in the State Legislature?  On the Federal level the IRS.   

Section: 2. All Political power is inherent in the people.  Government is instituted for the protection, security and benefit of the people; and they have the right to alter or reform the same, whenever the public good may require it.  

    May I add., NOT UNLESS WE HAVE THE COURAGE TO DEMAND IT! Ever wonder why tyrants in office want to take away your guns and God out of the institutions of Government? 

     I love this one, Sound Familiar?  Section:  21.  This enumeration of rights shall not be construed to impair or deny others retained by the people.  

This is my favorite:   Rights of Suffrage

Article II Sec: 5. No idiot or insane person, or person convicted of any infamous crime, shall be entitled to the privileges of and elector.  

     Today, one wonders, whose in the majority in or about Sacramento?

Article IV.  Sec: 27.  No Lottery shall be authorized by the state nor shall the sale of lottery tickets be allowed.

     Perhaps our leaders in Sacramento did not at the time realize the benefits of the lottery for the general fund?

     Sec: 35.  The legislature of the State shall prohibit by law, any person or persons, association, company, or corporation, from exercising the privileges of banking, or creating paper to circulate as money.

     Common sense must have flown out the window, do you think? I love the word shall, as in shall not, or shall prohibit. Pretty exclusive verbiage I would say!

     And finally Article XI Sec: 3. Entitled “Miscellaneous Provisions”

Members of the legislature, and all officers executive and judicial, except such inferior officers as may be by law exempted, shall before they enter on the duties of the respective offices, take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation:  “I do solemnly swear (or affirm as the case may be.) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California;  and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of _____according to the best of my ability.  And no other oath, declaration, or test, shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust.”

     The only fault I find with this is that it is perhaps inappropriately titled as an afterthought.  Truly each provision quoted is unique on its’ own terms. Our elected leaders too often appear to treat their responsibilities with a blasé unconcern, send me my check at the end of the week attitude, lacking any character.      I mean by character, that which portrays moral excellence, one who is honest, trustful, loyal, and most of all selfless.   

     When California solicited to become the 31^st State of the Union the men who formed it said this:  “the putting into operation of a government, which shall establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, promote the general welfare and secure the blessing of civil religious and political liberty, should be an object of the deepest solicitude to every true-hearted citizen, and the consummation of this dearest wishes.  The price of liberty is eternal vigilance, and this it is not only the privilege but the duty of every voter, to vote his sentiments. No freeman of this land who values his birth-right, and would transmit unimpaired to his children, and inheritance so rich in glory and in honor, will refuse to give one day to the service of his country. Let every qualified voter go early to the polls___.  (Let) the world see by what majority of freemen, California, the bright star of the west, claims a place in the diadem of the glorious Republic, formed by the union of thirty-one sovereign States.”

Diadem=”A Royal Crown”  

     Oh that if it were true now.  

46 + 46 = 8

46 + 46 = 8

Kevin Bryant 

President Obama is going to receive 46% of the vote in the general election no matter what happens. Governor Romney is going to receive 46% of the vote so long has he doesn’t do anything stupid. 

8% of the US population will decide who the next president will be and many have yet to make up their mind. It amazes me that the election will be decided by a relatively few people but it doesn’t surprise me at all. What amazes me is the reason why some of these people will vote the way they are going to. President Obama is going to have people voting for him because they want to continue getting their government handouts. Some will vote for him simply because he is black. Still others will vote for him because they don’t like George Bush (some people are so stupid they shouldn’t be allowed to vote). Yep, a guy on the radio the other day stated he was voting for Obama because he doesn’t want to see Bush back in office.  Romney will get votes for valid and stupid reasons as well.

No, I’m not surprised about the 8%. What does surprise me is how far apart the other 92% of the people are. This country has almost been ripped in half over the last 3 & ½ years. We have seen race warfare, class warfare, sexual orientation warfare, the war on women, the war on business, the war on the wealthy, war on the middle class, the war on taxes, the war on the TEA party, the war on what is and isn’t a real grass roots movement, the war on the constitution, the war on individual rights, the war to keep government out of our bedrooms…….and this list can keep going to fill this entire page. 

What I fail to understand is why on earth do we keep sending people to Washington who either wage these idiotic wars or idly sit by and allow them to happen instead of standing up and say with conviction “We are here to represent the people and the people are sick and tired of all this”.  

We the people of the United States formed this government. We the people elected those idiots in Washington (what the hell were we thinking) to represent us. I don’t believe in a democracy where the general population gets to decide everything. I do believe in a representative form of government but wake up because “we the people” aren’t being represented except by a small handful of the 535 members of congress who are supposed to represent us. We need to clean house from the top down. Reid, McConnell, Boehner, Pelosi, Clyburn and Cantor, yes indeed, get rid of all them. More importantly though clean out the white house from the top down.    

You really want to know why the 8% doesn’t surprise me. I really had a hard time in 08 voting for McCain. The more I studied him, the less I liked. What my vote came down to was the fact that I thought McCain wouldn’t stomp all over the constitution with as much excitement as Obama. What I didn’t see coming was Obama not only stomping on it but then ripping it up and wiping his butt with it. 

As I stated before, I am not a Romney fan but I will vote for him this time around. If in 3 years he has not impressed me, back into the 8% I go.

Who Are The Real Domestic Terrorists?

Who Are The Real Domestic Terrorists?
Kevin Bryant

While driving yesterday, I caught up to a late 70’s model Ford pickup doing about 55 in a 65 zone. I was about to pass them but I caught site of the Ron Paul sticker on the back glass, so I just rode behind him for a few seconds. While I was behind them, the thought of Sec. of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano popped into my head. As I finally passed the couple on the pickup, I noticed they were likely in their mid to late 70’s.

Why would I think of Janet Napolitano? Well, I had an idea of the type of people in the pickup in front of me and reflecting back on her department’s statement that the most likely domestic terrorist are white, own guns and have Ron Paul bumper stickers on their vehicles. This couple didn't look like terrorist to me. They looked more like someone I would I would like to have living next door to me.

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic”.

I have taken that oath multiple times in my life just as every retired or multiple hitch veteran has done. Problem is, who are the real Domestic Terrorist? Janet Napolitano and the majority of the Obama administration would like us to believe that the 70+ year old couple that I saw driving on U.S. Highway 50 on Sunday is a likely domestic terrorist and enemy of the United States. Which is more likely to have breached the limits of the constitution, the couple I saw driving or Janet Napolitano? Who is more likely to violate mine and your constitutional rights, the elder couple or Janet Napolitano? Who is trying to control our lives, the elderly couple or Janet Napolitano?

Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security and another Obama yes person flunky. I am of the opinion there are more Domestic Terrorist on the federal government payroll in Washington DC, by either election or appointment, who mean to do us harm and strip this nation of the constitution than there are in all 50 states combined.

Here is one question the elderly couple would be the correct answer to……. Who would I trust more standing behind the barrel of a loaded rifle fighting FOR this country and what it supposed to stand for, the elderly couple or Janet Napolitano?

Dear Patriots:

Dear Patriots

William Grant Burmer

In light of the plethora of Executive orders by the President, the regulations of his czars, and the left wing communists in the Congress, it is left to us to remedy the dilemma they have forged upon “We The People.” We are not left without hope if we continue as we have with the “Tea Party Movement.” Its success largely lie with us individually and collectively to right these wrongs. 

A little bit of history will help us see more clearly how we can overcome these Unconstitutional Mandates:

In 1828 President Jackson instituted what became known as the “tariff act of 1828” A Tax upon South Carolina on imports from Briton. Essentially forcing the South to pay higher taxes on goods they did not produce. And offhandedly made the British pay more for the cotton they purchased from the South.

In 1828 however the South issued what was known as the right to “Nullification.” In U.S. history this is based on the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution. It held that any state has a right to declare null and void any federal law that they deem unconstitutional, the federal government has no right to exercise powers not specifically assigned to it by the U.S. Constitution; as early as 1799 Kentucky and Virginia declared nullification to be the rightful remedy by the states for ALL UNAUTHORIZED acts done under the pretext of the Constitution. In this instance of 1828 which, favored the North over the South. 

The Industries of the Northern New England states could not compete with the cheaper imports of the South precipitating the Tariff in the first place. Several remedies were sought after however all eventually, as we all know led to Civil War in 1864. 

Our cause should be to support those in our legislatures to steadfastly demand that the federal government not exceed it constitutional authority. Be it “Obama Care, ” Executive orders, of Congressional Legislation, if it is not authorized Constitutionally, based upon delegated authority, we have a right and moral obligation to oppose and declare their actions Null and Void.

Nullification is commendable as a principal because its persistent practice engenders trust between the elected and the electorate and encourages reliable patterns of interaction between the citizen, the state and Local Authorities as well as the federal government; all creatures of “We The People.”

The concerned citizens of our Republic are no longer willing to defer to Congress, State Legislators, or other elected officials at any level to repeal Unconstitutional Laws and oppression upon our unalienable rights to pursue our own happiness. We have a right and a duty to unashamedly assume our right to derail the “long train of abuses and usurpations” and ‘provide new Guards for (our) future security” ---The States and most importantly ---themselves. Speak out America Let those we elect hear our voices!!! Let God hear from us in our pleas for his help in these worthy pursuits.

Open Letter to Barack Obama

Open Letter to Barack Obama

Al Ritter 

Mr. President, I don’t care about time line of what happened inside Osama bin Laden’s complex, who went in first or on what floor our brave members of Seal Team Six attacked first. What really bothers me the most is how you continually claim your participation as “I did this, or I did that.” Let’s face it you gave the final go ahead and then you watched on TV like everyone else in the situation room. It wasn’t your bullet that ended his life it was a bullet from one of OUR brave SEALS.

Can’t we just agree to describe the actions that night as……”the SEALS won and we watched?”

What really gets my goat is the fact that you have used the attack that night as a reason to re-elect you? You have turned this into a political football that you somehow feel the need to keep spiking week after week! How about rather than claiming bin Laden’s death as “I got him” and to start claiming that “we got him,” it sure sounds less conceited.

Once Osama was killed, you just couldn't keep the news to yourself, you just HAD to report it! 90% of the intel the Seals retrieved became "old intel" the minute you reported it. You had over 200 intel experts working on the huge cache of information you got from Osama's compound, but the were hog tied for time because you were like a little child with a secret! Once it was announced that all the intel grabbed from the compound was now in YOUR grubby little hands, the terrorists abandoned every target, every safe house, every objective because you couldn't keep your damn mouth shut!

On another political football claim, “you gave women free contraceptive” and at the same time have alienated millions of Catholics in the process. Once again you assumed something that was not necessarily so. You were convinced that most Catholic women would support you over their religion. You assumed that because many Catholic women use contraceptives this legislation was a “slam dunk” for your side because your healthcare would pay for it. What you failed to take into account was that those women made that decision on their own and they needed no help from you either morally or financially. The result of your decision was to reduce freedom of religion to a mere footnote of history rather than the milestone of the constitution.

Your most recent attack on Catholics has not gone unnoticed. Your intentional intimidation by the State Department when you declared the Vatican as a potential money laundering group is beyond comprehension. This is a clear signal that you want the Catholics to stop fighting you and fall into line or else!

In your words, “I want to make it perfectly clear.” I am not a Catholic but I see your attack as transparent and self-serving. I am reminded of a quote from WWII that goes like this:

“In Germany they came first for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up
because I wasn't a Communist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up
because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for the trade
unionists, and I didn't speak up
because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak up
because I was a Protestant.

Then they came for me,
and by that time
no one was left to speak up.

Reverend Martin Niemoller….1945

November is coming fast Mr. President and we remember the atrocities of WWII and the  egomaniac that prematurely ended so many innocent lives based on one group being “better” than another. We saw how quickly Adolph Hitler rose to power under the guise of class warfare.

You have once again assumed that we are stupid, somehow we won’t liken your behavior to a tyrant of the past……you have forgotten the axiom, “Fool me once shame on me.” We have been fooled once in 2008……There will be NO shame on us in November.

Obama Attorney Admits in Open Court That Obama’s Birth Certificate is a Forgery

Obama Attorney Admits in Open Court That Obama’s Birth Certificate is a Forgery

Al Ritter 

I can see you have a puzzled look on your face and you are asking why the lawyer would admit that. The case was in New Jersey and was forced by a recent ballot challenge. Alexandra Hill a legal associate with the law firm Genova, Burn, & Giantomasi Attorneys in Newark, took a desperate attempt at explaining away the fraudulent document by saying that, even though it is a forgery, that alone isn’t enough to say that President Obama isn’t eligible to be President. 

I can see you are really shaking your head now! Ok follow with me on this twisted logic. Hill explained that his popularity and landslide victory in 2008 alone should be enough to secure his seat as President. Because he never claimed that the birth certificate was the actual legal document that proved his citizenship, the forgery label is a separate issue that has to be decided later. She went on to say that the State of New Jersey in no way describes the qualifications for a candidate to be a prerequisite to being added to the ballot, that requirement rests entirely with the federal verbiage.

The Daily Pen Editor, Penbrook Johannson opines ; “Sadly, regardless of her moral deficiency, Hill is legally justified, Obama’s eligibility is a separate matter than the charges of forgery and fraud. Of course, we have evidence that he is not eligible. But, evidence of forgery by as yet unidentified counterfeiters working on behalf of Obama is not what legally excludes Obama from appearing on a ballot, by itself, until some authority is willing to consider this as evidence of forgery on its merit as an indication of actual ineligibility in a court of legal authority. Until some court of competent jurisdiction is willing to hear evidence of forgery and fraud, you can’t legally punish a political candidate for that crime which has not been proven that they committed. However, since Obama is not eligible because of a lack of authenticated evidence to the contrary, he could be held off the ballot for that reason.”

According to Johannson, there is an overwhelming level of moral certainty that Obama is a usurper, but until a court with jurisdiction considers this case, Obama’s status as a legitimate president is in limbo.

Unfortunately Judge Masin denied the motion to remove Obama from the ballot. This all took place on April 10, 2012, this merely takes up precious time and until Obama is found to be an active participant in the presentation of governmental document forgery, the admission will go nowhere.

Fortunately this admission lends credibility to Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona’s cold case posse’s report on the birth certificate investigation. It also gives a degree of credibility to all the conservative stalwarts that have claimed from the presentation of this document that it is in fact a forgery.

What kind of country uses Supreme Court judges to claim constantly that the American people have “no standing” to question the eligibility of a President, even after his attorney has admitted that the single supporting document has now been declared a forgery? Not one case has been heard on the merits, only denied as to “standing.”

It’s about time we ALL stand up and be counted on this issue of a usurper leading our country to destruction!

UPDATE:Judge Jeff S. Masin who heard the argument ruled in a written opinion on the same day that New Jersey law does not require Obama to produce ANY proof he is eligible to be president in order to be placed on the primary ballot.
Masin prevented the petitioner’s counsel, Mario Apuzzo, from placing Obama’s birth certificate into evidence. Apuzzo wasn’t even allowed to call to the stand a witness offering expert testimony that Obama’s birth certificate is a FORGERY despite his correct argument that Obama, according to the Constitution, has to be a “natural born Citizen” and that he has not met the burden of proof to show that he is eligible to be on the New Jersey primary ballot!

Uncle Ted Threatens the President?

Uncle Ted Threatens the President?

Al Ritter 

Sometimes Ted Nugent is funny, and sometimes Ted is crude, sometimes he is abrasive, but last week he was dead on point. I am not on board with his selection for President, but I think he sees November as America’s last stand on personal freedom. I fear he may be right. 

Ted sees everything that has been done, and every law that has been passed in the last 3 ½ years is against EVERYTHING that our forefathers envisioned for our country. Ted claims that the Obama Administration has “wiped their ass with the constitution.” Crude? Well of course it is, but Ted’s words are mere symptoms of the frustration that most logical Americans feel. 

Recently a law was passed through congress that makes it a FELONY to voice your constitutional right to give your opinion of our government in the presence of both the president and the Secret Service. The scary part of all this is that it got a majority vote from both democrats and republicans! Let that sink in a moment…….BOTH parties voted to VIOLATE the Constitution based on prerequisites that they agreed on! Worst is the idea that they have limited our freedom for one person’s benefit…….the President! 

Based on this abusive law of power, Obama this week saw fit to threaten Ted Nugent based on the following comment; “if Obama is reelected within one year I will either be dead or in jail.” Obama has now called out the primary dogs from the secret service to investigate a “threat made on the president.” 

From the very beginning of this statement I assumed Nugent meant that he felt threatened and would be in fear of his own life or false imprisonment from the Obama Administration if Obama were reelected. 

The spin that came from the Whitehouse on this issue was that Nugent inferred that he would be dead because he tried to kill Obama. Now this sure is a far stretch from his actual words. I’ll let you decide what he meant as you listen to his direct words on YouTube.

The REAL War on Women

The REAL War On Women

Kevin Bryant

For a while now I have wondered why it costs Sandra Fluke $1000.00 per year for contraceptives when most women pay between $108 - $360 a year? Some pay even less than $100 a year. Seriously, how does she ever plan on finishing law school? Think about it, she is doing at least 10 appearances a month between talk shows and speeches and photo opportunities. That has to take up at least 15 days a month. If her lifestyle demands she must spend $1000 a year on contraceptives, well that’s a lot of time spent in bed or the back of a car. When does she have the time to actually study or attend class? Hey Sandra, I have a great money saving idea for you. If your lifestyle demands that much sex, it would be cheaper if you go out and purchase a 36 count box of condoms once a month and make your partner use when required. Seriously, Wal-Mart sells them for $11.18 a box online.

If someone forces a woman to have sex, it’s rape. If both partners are willing, then both should have to share in the cost and use of protection if they don’t want to have a child. If the guy is not willing to pay for at least half the cost, why on earth would you be having sex with him in the first place??? The war on women’s contraceptive……what a friggin joke.

Here is the REAL war on women……… OBAMACARE. Remember democrats passed Obamacare without a single republican voting for it in either house.

Most Dr’s recommend women start having mammograms at least once a year at age 40. Some recommend it earlier. Obamacare does not cover the cost of mammograms until the age of 50. I’m no expert but isn’t one of the leading causes of death in women breast cancer? With most insurances, your mammograms are covered even before age 40. Michelle Obama isn’t subject to Obamacare. She will be able to get her mammograms paid for in full by the American taxpayer. So will Nancy Pelosi and Barbara Boxer and Sheila Jackson Lee and all those other democrat women in congress who told you that Obamacare will be the best thing since sliced bread and they passed the bill because they care about you.

The real war on women’s health is the fact that you now have to wait an additional 10 years if the law holds up to even find out if you have breast cancer. I’m no doctor but I know the earlier you catch it, the more likely you are to survive. It’s not rocket science. Under the democrat’s healthcare plan (Obamacare), even if you find a lump in your breast, a panel of bureaucrats many of whom will know even less than I do about medicine will be deciding your fate on whether or not you can even have a mammogram if you are under the age of 50.

Wait, there’s more.

Those women lucky enough to survive this democratic party government ran healthcare plan nightmare to reach the age of 50, there is even more in store for you.

Women live on average almost 6 years longer than men do. If Obamacare does hold up in court, you have more things to look forward to. That is 6 more years of the same panel of bureaucratic idiots determining if you are going to get a hip replacement, surgery to relieve the pain in your lower back or anything that might your last 10 years on earth more comfortable. Remember those Quality of Life (death) panels the administration tried to call a tea party fabrication until Sarah Palin pointed out their exact location in the healthcare law then you never heard the administration speak of them again? If you are 70 years old and have breast cancer, cervical cancer, osteoporosis, need a new hip, kidney, heart or whatever, well the panels, according to the law as it is written now, can and likely will not allow or approve the things you need. Their idea of care at that point is to hook you up to a morphine I.V. and allow you to die pain free. Oh wait, the law does allow them to have some hospice person with you so you don’t die alone.

You are probably saying, well doesn’t this apply to men? Yes it does but facts are facts and the fact is, women out live men and more women die in hospitals than men do. As men, we typically work and stress ourselves out until out bodies wear out then it’s not much longer after that we die. This of course is fine with me because once I live out my usefulness and independence, I hope I die the next day before I become a burden to someone else. So yes, men will experience this as well nowhere near in numbers as women.

The number 1 goal of Obamacare is lower the cost of healthcare but not the way you think. The faster you die, the less the government has to shell out for your care which gives them more money to waste on things like another bridge to nowhere, the effects of cow farts on the ozone, does the male or female dragonfly enjoy sex more. You know, those all actually important things.

Republican war on women? Only in Obama’s dreamworld.

Indignant

Dear Patriots:

William Grant Burmer

I have found myself deleting many or most of the information sent to me concerning the goings on about President Obama as of late. Most all commentary is redundant, if it is new and revealing it only serves to fortify suspicions previously formulated about the fellow. In other words, no surprises!

One thing you can be sure of, no matter what comes out of his mouth it is either a lie, or you can count on him doing the exact opposite. He cannot be trusted, is a master at deception; there is no doubt his ideology is socialistic, dictatorial, and clearly narcissistic, a word way over used by the media et al; better said, he has no humility or esteem for any other opinion other than his own.

Only the very idiotic would vote again for Obama. I wish I could find anything about this president that would edify one to aspire to live another day under his leadership. He hates America, embraces Islam, in other words Satanism, is not a Christian, supports and defends our enemies and does everything he can to undermine our own military; In short, he is a Traitor to all the ideals our country has stood for the last 200 plus years. He is worse than a Benedict Arnold, at least he had the dignity to return to England and live out his life after the revolution. Obama and his family should return to Kenya and live out his life with his brother in a mud hut; even that would be too good for him.

To say that I have anything but enmity for this man or his ilk would be an understatement. Anyone, President, domestic citizen, welfare slug, idiot, or alien, if you don’t love America, if you believe our Constitution is unjust, pack your bags and leave, don’t look back, you’re not welcome here!!!!

As President Lincoln said, we can live on only if we humble ourselves before the offended powers of heaven, "confess our national sins, pray for clemency and forgiveness," and stop giving mere lip service to the Almighty.

And then, blessed with victory and peace, this heaven-rescued land can justly "Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation! . . . Then conquer we must, When our cause it is just and this be our motto; 'In God is our trust!' And the Star - Spangled Banner In triumph shall wave o’er the land of the free and the home of the brave." (Francis Scott Key, "The Star-Spangled Banner.") Emphasis added.

William Grant Burmer, An American patriot, lover of Capitalism, Viet Nam Veteran, and Christian.

2 for 1

2 for 1

Kevin Bryant

Obama’s D.C.

Washington D.C. The capital of our nation.

Obama’s D.C. The idea of using our nation’s capital to launch an all out Divide & Conquer mission on the people of the United States.

“People of Pennsylvania clinging to their guns and religion”. “The Cambridge Police acted stupidly”. “The rich need to pay their fair share”. “If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon”.

These are just a few examples of the statements Obama has made in an attempt to divide America either by race or by class. “One nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all”. These words mean nothing to President Obama.

Nations have come and gone since shortly after the dawn of man. Almost every nation that didn’t survive died because it either spent itself into financial ruin or its population was divided among racial or class lines and they destroyed themselves. Does any of this sound familiar and similar to what is happening in America today? From Ancient Rome to the Soviet Union, empires have risen and fallen. Are we next? Obama seems to be doing everything within his powers to assist in our downfall.

Over 5 trillion in new debt. Deep defense cuts to pay for new programs. Healthcare reform that negates the very constitution this nation was founded on. An economic plan that calls for more taxes but no actual cost cutting. A new cry of blame the right, blame the rich, blame the banks, blame racial bigotry (blame the crackers - since I am one, I can say that), blame the kiosk & ATMs, blame George Bush. Blame anything and everything that will support and enhance the idea of divide and conquer.

Play Time Is Over

As much as I don’t like Mitt Romney, he is a better choice than Obama to be President of the United States.

Ron Paul, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, play time is over. You all had your shot and you all lost. It’s time to drop out.

Paul, Santorum and Gingrich each pledged to support the Republican nominee. It’s beyond obvious that the nominee is going to be Romney unless some scandal breaks in the 7.5 months or for some strange reason is life is cut short before the general election.

How is wasting money on failed primary campaigns that could be better used if put towards the general election “supporting” the nominee? As I said, play time is over, the game is finished……..now it’s time for each of you to take your toys and go home.

Bully Pulpit

Bully Pulpit

Al Ritter 

Bully Pulpit as described by Wikipedia: An older term within the U.S. Government, a bully pulpit is a public office or other position of authority of sufficiently high rank that provides the holder with an opportunity to speak out and be listened to on any matter. The bully pulpit can bring issues to the fore-front that were not initially in debate, due to the office's stature and publicity.

Originally a term coined by Theodore Roosevelt has taken on a new meaning in the last three years by now President Barack Obama. The word “bully” is now used as an adjective rather than a noun, as Barack Obama has seen fit to interject his ideology on the two branches of government. It’s no secret that has verbally harassed and vilified the republican legislative branch of government even though Democratic and Republican lawmakers share the same public distain.

Now President Obama has attacked the most sacred branch of government, the judicial branch. This attack started last year during the State of the Union Speech as Obama mischaracterized a decision handed down by the Supreme Court, prompting Judge Alito silently mouth, “that’s not what it meant.” Obama chose to lambast the judges publicly at that speech and now this week he chose to ratchet up the rhetoric. During a press conference Obama one again claimed that if the Supreme Court overturned a law (Obamacare) it would be an unprecedented move.

This so angered a 5^th circuit court judge who was hearing another state case on the healthcare law that he placed a demand on the federal attorney to go back to the DOJ and have them write a 3 page single spaced essay on the power of the Judicial Branch of government and be specific. Her essay is due today.

This should be the showdown to educate the uneducated public as to the role of the Supreme Court. This is what the Supreme Court does people! If they see a law as unconstitutional they rule it so! It’s been this way since the Marbury vs. Madison ruling in 1803. Obama and Holder both know this any 12^th grader who took a civics class knows this. Obama and Holder are merely hoping that their uneducated voters don’t know this and they can bully anyone who doesn’t see their way!

Trayvon Martin

Trayvon Martin
Kevin Bryant

My prayers go out to the Martin Family for the loss of their child.

Trayvon Martin – I am tired of hearing that name. It’s like a call for blacks to riot once again. We have school students in Florida protesting this shooting during school hours instead of the being in the classroom. Worst of all they are being lead by the school administrators and faculty. What a great example of our tax dollars hard at work. Just one more of a 1000 reasons why our education system has went from the best in the world to 30th since the federal government has gotten their grubby hands all in the education system.

George Zimmerman, the man who shot Trayvon now has a $10,000 bounty on his head placed there by the same Black Panther party Eric Holder and Barack Obama refuse to prosecute for voter intimidation. He is now having to live in hiding, fearful for his life. Where is the President and the United States Attorney General? One is hiding under his desk and the other is out calling this a tragedy and pretending to be sympathetic to the family of Trayvon Martin.

Eric Holder is a prime example of wasted oxygen and wasted space. He’s so worthless we won’t even bother with him. This leaves us with the Hugo Chavez wannabee of North America, Barack Obama. Where is his condemnation of the Black Panther party? Where is his wasted words of civility? Where is the man who took an oath to protect and defend the constitution that is supposed to protect George Zimmerman?

Never mind the fact that Trayvon was in a gated community after dark where he did not live. It’s been reported that his father had a girlfriend who lived in this community and he was with her before this tragedy occurred. Why didn’t the girlfriend give him a ride home? If she lives in a gated community certainly she can afford the gas. Why did she not escort him to the gate? She knew there were community patrols out there watching for people who under any reasonable circumstance would not be in their neighborhood. She also knew of the break-in’s that had recently taken place in the area. Why is no one condemning her inactions?

Barack Obama stated if he had a son, he would look like Trayvon Martin. Really? Would your pretend son act like him too? I know I would be a proud
parent if my son acted like Trayvon did that night……NOT!!!!!

George Zimmerman spotted a man (kid – hard to tell in the dark) in his neighborhood while on a neighborhood watch patrol that everyone in the neighborhood knew was happening regularly. He calls 9-1-1 and follows Trayvon. The dispatcher tells Mr. Zimmerman to stop following the “subject”. Now, if it were me, I too would continue following the ‘subject” until they were clear of my neighborhood. Mr. Zimmerman attempted to do this according to the police report, but he lost sight of Trayvon. Mr. Zimmerman states he exited his vehicle to do a quick search of the immediate area but does not see the “subject”. He attempts to return to his vehicle but is suddenly approached from behind by Trayvon Martin and is punched in the face, knocking him to the ground. Mr. Zimmerman states Trayvon continues to his him and repeatedly slams his head against the pavement (or cement).

After multiple attempts to stop the onslaught, Mr. Zimmerman finally pulls a pistol and shoots Trayvon in the chest. This is the statement Mr. Zimmerman made to the police. Multiple eye witnesses tell the police they witnessed Trayvon assaulting Mr. Zimmerman while he was yelling and pleading for help. The wounds sustained by Mr. Zimmerman were consistent with his description of the events.

It doesn’t matter that George Zimmerman is half Hispanic, most blacks refuse to call this anything other than a white man killing a black kid. Never mind that Trayvon was beating this man senseless, no- this was clearly murder according to Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. Hey Al and Jesse, if I remember correctly isn’t on the 10 commandments “Thou Shall Not Bear False Witness Against Thy Neighbor”. You may
not know the meaning but I am sure God does.

This is a tragedy. This is another example of a senseless death in America. Should George Zimmerman have followed this kid as aggressively as he did…….no. Should Trayvon have attacked his follower…..hell no. Does the President need to politicize this event….OH HELL NO.

A good President would use this moment to comfort those affected and unite those
following the events. A good President would condemn the actions of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and others using this to divide America further by race. A Good President would direct his Attorney General to investigate and prosecute those in the Black Panther party who have threatened and placed a bounty on the life of an non-convicted American citizen.

All people want to do these days is blame someone for everything that goes wrong. So here, I am going to blame someone……. The girlfriend. Unless she is somehow incapable of at least driving or walking her boyfriend’s son out of a gated and patrolled community, I’m going to blame her. She REALLY should have known better than to allow this kid to walk out of there alone and unescorted. What’s her excuse?

Sheriff Joe Arpaio Breaks New Ground

Sheriff Joe Arpaio Breaks New Ground
Al Ritter

Arpaio has done something that no other court in America has allowed so far. He has done an investigation based on evidence. Every court finding so far has declared that citizens in general even including servicemenhave “no standing” to even start an investigation. So there is NO confusion,these judges that make that decree have decided not to hear the case at all. Evidence pertaining to Obama’s eligibility has never been heard.

Arpaio was asked by a Tea Party group to investigate the Birth Certificate that Obama offered as evidence of his birth place. To be fair Arpaio has only investigated this piece of evidence because it was the only piece that Obama has personally offered. Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse embarked upon a 6 month investigation of the document and as the lead investigator told the media. “We started this investigation to prove the legitimacy of the birth certificate. Unfortunately after our investigation we can’t give that final declaration.”

The findings of the Cold Case Posse are simple yet definitive.

The birth certificate was “generated” by a computer program and not scanned from an original. This proves what the “birthers” have declared for a longtime. For the first time the legitimacy of the President is in question is based on proof, not conjecture.

The $64,000 question now is what will be done about it? Will Arpaio actually
offer an arrest warrant for fraud? Will Arpaio request that Obama’s name be
removed from Arizona’s slate as the democratic nominee for President of the
United States in November?

Whatever the result is…….The Document Obama offered up as evidence of his citizenship has been declared a forgery. The next step has yet to be made.

The Mess We Made

The Mess We Made
Kevin Bryant

I know some of you out there are Romney supporters, some for Ron Paul and about as
many are for the other two, Gingrich & Santorum. Personally, I am not thrilled by any of them but all them are better than the current occupant of the white house.

It doesn’t matter which of these individuals get into the white house because they are all basically the same. None of them are real conservatives, not even Ron Paul. None are really strong on national defense. None are willing to fight the fight that it would take to truly secure the borders and despite all the hot air they have spewed, none is really wanting to actually reduce the number of people who currently work for the government or willing to bring those workers down to a level even with private sector workers.

Sure, they talk the talk but when have they ever walked the walk? Never,
according to their own records except Ron Paul and a snowball has better chance
of surviving a vacation in hell than he does of winning the white house.

Sadly, we ran off the best candidates. Sure, it is doubtful the best candidates would have been able to defeat Obama but not impossible. Of those that are out of the race, I would much rather see Huntsman, Perry, Cain or even Gary Johnson in the white house than any of the 4 remaining. Last go round, Huckabee would have been better than McCain or Romney but we ran him off. After Clinton beat Bush 41, who did we elect to run against him…….Bob Dole, nice man but a big government moderate at best.

No matter which gets elected, we can all rest assured that the best we can hope for out of these four is a president and an administration comparable to the likes of George H.W. Bush. The country wasn’t better off with Bush 41 in office than it was with Reagan, Eisenhower, or even Gerald Ford in office. Of course it also wasn’t as bad as when LBJ, Carter or Nixon were in office either.

Sadly, I didn’t even vote in the Missouri primary and this past week I didn’t caucus here either. Why does it matter? Republicans keep sending up moderates who they think can bring the country together but with every passing election, the left just keeps moving further left widening the gap.

How much further left are you willing to go? I’m sick and tired of having the choice of voting for a far left of center democrat or a republican willing to go betray conservative principals and move beyond center and into left territory to get watered down compromises that doesn’t do anything but slow down the left’s destruction of the constitution and self governance.

This election, like the last, I’ll vote for the lesser of two evils. 2016, republicans put up another fake conservative, I’ll be voting 3rd party and encouraging others to join me.

The Capture and Release that Led to the Death of Agent

The Capture and Release that Led to the Death of Agent
Brian Terry
Al Ritter

So there is no mistake about who instituted Operation
fast and Furious we need a time line. Democrats want Republicans to believethat the ill-fated program was started by President George Bush, but that just isn’t true. Project Gunrunner was Bush’s program but didn’t involve the illegal passing of automatic weapons into illegal gun dealers hands, unfortunately operation Fast and Furious did.

I equate Fast and Furious to an FBI investigation about say the Mafia and a murder for hire issue. To blend in the FBI does actual murders and claims it is merely an investigation, thereby becoming the very thing they are investigating. Of course the FBI was never involved in such a thing but we can see the flawed thinking that went into Fast and Furious.

Barack Obama took the office of President on Jan 20, 2009 and it wasn’t until October 2009 that Operation Fast and Furious started under the ATF. Up until now we never really knew the aim of the program but through the Freedom of Information Act the Times/ Tribune were able to obtain documents that show the actual aim of the ill-fated operation.

Previous to the commencement of Fast and Furious on April 16, 2009 President Obama and Mexican President Felipe Calderon issued a joint address that 90% of all guns used by drug cartels in violence in Mexico come from America. Later Secretary of State Clinton repeated those same figures as did several high ranking Democratic lawmakers. This figure was later discredited as the real figure was closer to 17% but even that figure is disputed because the Mexican Government never gave us all the weapons only particular ones they hand-picked, so the figure is probably still too high.

In an effort to prove that guns are evil and should be removed form America, the Obama Administration instituted Operation Fast and Furious through Eric Holder and the ATF in October 2009. Through the documents obtained it was found that the ATF was after 20 individuals suspected of illegal gunrunning activities. On top of that list was Manuel Fabian Celis-Acosta a 24 year old gunrunner from Mexico. He was suspected of being the top gunrunner with connections to the Mexican Cartel. On May 2010 Celis-Acosta was detained in a remote area of Arizona. He was found with 74 rounds of ammunition and nine cellphone in his old BMW.

ATF Special Agent Hope McAllister the lead agent in Operation Fast and Furious personally questioned Celis-Acosta, knowing full well his real identity there was no case of mistaken identity. Celis-Acosta promised to cooperate with McAllister, so the promise seemed enough for McAllister and she released him even though he was the ATF’s top target!

On December 15, 2010 was the fateful day that Border Agent Brian Terry was gunned down by an actual weapon passed to an illegal gunrunner by the ATF. One can’t help but to wonder if Terry’s murder would have happened at all if this operation never happened.

Operation Fast and Furious shut down as a direct result of Terry’s death in January 2011, a mere 15 months after it began. On February of 2011 Manuel Fabian Celis-Acosta was arrested with the 19 other targets of Operation Fast and Furious………none of which have actually been prosecuted as of yet.

It seems very sad to me that this Administration has seen fit to make this a political football. Operation Fast and Furious was started to prove the grossly overinflated claimed percentage of American weapons in the hands of the Mexican drug cartel. The eventual aim of this administration is to take guns out of the hands of the citizens of our country, unfortunately this have not only backfired, but have virtually blown up in the collective faces of this Administration, embarrassing us not only in the world’s eyes but in the eyes of the citizens who were used as the Administration’s pawn.