“Al Gore should be sued”

“Al Gore should be sued for fraud”, said John Coleman to the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change, on March 3 in New York. The weather channel’s founder is critical of the climate change alarmists, and claims that an open court is the only way for the true science to be heard. He went on to say that the weather channel has lost their way, and has made every mistake in the book, leading the way for an upcoming sale of the channel. “Let’s hope the new owners can recapture the vision, and stop telling us what to think” (referring to Heidi Cullen’s 2006 blog on global warming.) Heidi Cullen argued on her blog that weathercasters who had doubts about human influence on global warming should “be punished by decertification by the American Meteorological Society. Coleman went on to say that he believes that a law- suit should be brought against all who sell carbon credits (this includes Al Gore.) Coleman says that such a public account would bring to light how the present policies on Climate Change have been arrived upon.

Asking a meteorologist about the cause of global warming is like asking the teller at your local bank about world economy. There are thousands of meteorologists in the world, and although some have gone on to other specific areas and obtained a masters or doctorate degrees, most don’t. Climatologists on the other hand number only 80 worldwide, and their study is very specific to climate change, and yet political figures on state and federal basis have sought to censure them, and enforce a political stance of their own agenda. Meteorology deals with short-term weather, such as predicting, while climatology deals with changes over long periods (usually millenniums.) So my question is this; if a meteorologist has problems with predicting a weather change in 7 days, why should we believe their opinion on global warming? If Heidi Cullen feels that another meteorologists’ credentials should be removed for not believing the way she does, then why can’t her credentials be removed for a bad weather forecast? Her position is only slightly better then Al Gore’s she actually did well in science in college. Personally, I’d rather believe a climatologist about global warming then to deal with people who keep telling us there should be no discussion on the subject because they are right……what are they hiding?

IPCC findings have been changed by the UN
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=56dd129d-e40a-4bad-abd9-68c808e8809e page 23
Section entitled "What happened to Al's Mentor"
http://www.americanthinker.com/2006/06/gores_grave_new_world.html

State climatologists castigated
http://www.heatisonline.org/contentserver/objecthandlers/index.cfm?id=6282&method=full

http://www.heatisonline.org/contentserver/objecthandlers/index.cfm?ID=6045&Method=Full&PageCall=&Title=Virginia+Governor%3A+Michaels+Does+Not+Speak+for+the+State&Cache=False

http://www.kgw.com/news-local/stories/kgw_020607_news_taylor_title.59f5d04a.html
19,000 verified scientists whom disagree with gore’s assessment of the cause of global warming
http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p357.htm


“He who permits himself to tell a lie once, finds it much easier to do it a second and a third time, till at length it becomes habitual; he tells lies without attending to it, and truths without the world’s believing him.” —Thomas Jefferson