Al Ritter
This brings back memories from my mother’s last
narcissistic husband when he defended himself by saying, “So now we are placing
blame?” In the real world we investigate to find the shortcomings and then make
corrections so the failure never happens again.
When the failures become so massive fingers will be
pointing. As Dan Bongino said the other day, “You had one job!” Truer words
couldn’t have been spoken.
The first failure was the advance prep. This is the
initial visit by the Secret Service Advance Team. On this visit they note all
the problem areas, places a sniper could hide or gain access to higher ground.
Those areas will be marked on their initial map and later used to place armed guards
on the day of the campaign stop. Crooks firing position was reportedly 130
yards from the stage where Trump spoke. This was clearly within the danger
perimeter. No officers were around the base of the building on the day of the
event.
Second failure rested with the local law enforcement
sniper. I say local law enforcement because normally the Secret Service snipers
usually wear all black fatigues with Police emblazoned on the back but
underneath is says Secret Service. The defense snipers on the roof only had the
word Police in their vests. This brings up yet another question. Who makes the
decision of which division is in charge of what function? In other words who
makes the decision to use local law enforcement snipers or Secret Service
Snipers? Who decides if local law enforcement or Secret Service is used around
the perimeter? Who gives the order to take out the assassin?
Third failure: It is reported that every other
campaign stop there are secondary visual impairments used to break up a direct
line of sight to the stage, whether it be in the form of dump trucks large
cranes etc. A woman who has sold merchandise at every one of Trumps campaign
stops claims that these visual impairments were not present at this event and
she had a bad feeling about this stop.
Fourth failure: It was reported that a police officer
investigating the crowd report of a man on top of the building was boosted up
to the roof by a second officer was surprised by Crooks who reportedly aimed
his rifle towards the cop and scared him back to the ground. Shortly after,
Crooks fired his deadly weapon. Why didn’t the cop have his own weapon drawn
before breaching the edge of the roof to investigate?
Fifth failure: Reportedly the law enforcement sniper
had Crooks in his sights for 2-3 minutes. This is where the reports get a
little hazy. There is some discussion as to if the sniper needed permission to
take the shot, if there is some sort of rules of engagement before a shot can
be taken. Another question is…if the sniper had Crooks in his sights that long
why didn’t he see the interaction between Crooks and the officer on the roof?
If permission had to be given to the sniper to fire why wasn’t everyone on the
same communication channel where the sniper could have warned the ground crew
to get Trump down to the ground behind the bullet proof area of the stage
before the fatal shots were fired? Why
must a law enforcement sniper be required to react and not be proactive to
remove the threat before it happens?
The only thing that was done well was the ground crew
that piled on Trump initially. Although the DEI hires that were well below
Trump’s stature certainly gave the candidate additional exposure that put him
at additional risk.
Now the FBI has jurisdiction in the investigation,
this is yet another possible failure in the making. This is the department that
has vilified Trump and even tampered with evidence in the documents trial. I’m
not sure this is the group that should be doing the investigation. I would
personally welcome an investigation by a JAG group from the military.
These are my personal feelings after viewing the
evidence I have at my disposal
Below are the links I used, hopefully you can come to
a conclusion on your own:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSNM7s0VLe4&t=137s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko9FO_vs668
https://potuspaper.com/lwsstutbtbgb/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/07/exclusive-trump-assassination-ive-been-every-trump-rally/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TY3SkEJC8hM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=439Ub1JFJD4
More questions then answers now:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/07/fed-law-enforcement-controlling-news-about-trump-rally/
Trump didn't even have real Secret Service Agents:
13 comments:
I see enough blame to go around to everyone involved this whole situation was FUBARED from the beginning!
Time to completely eliminate the Secret Service and replace it with U.S. Marine Corp. security teams.
I think Kim Cheadle should resign over this failure
As it should. There is no room for mistakes if you are secret service.
No drones or helicopters?
I'm not sure I'd trust any of the three letter government entities to protect me if I was Donald Trump!
I have not been able to confirm yet, but the current head of the Secret Service used to be the lead for then 3nd lady Jills detail..... and is not in charge of the SS. Seems a bit fishy to me.
The shooter was obviously brainwashed into believing Trump is an enemy.
Who do you think brainwashed him?
Hint: You can safely bet it wasn’t Republicans nor conservative news media.
Interesting perspective. I think if I were Trump, I'd have my own Army of protection. At least people he trusts to protect him.
Well, what I saw was they had the guy in their sights and was waiting for him to pull the trigger before they took him out. The one even flinched when he shot
@ unknown....Cheatle was a higher up in the Administration of the Secret Service in the Bush era under Chaney's request, she then retired to civilian life to work for Pepsi as the head of security for them. She was tagged to head the Secret Service by Jill Biden and then appointed by Joe. She has a long history of diversity hires.
Kim Cheatle only has 4 1/2 months left in her job, I wonder if Pepsi will take her back?
Good article, I shared on FB
Post a Comment